Spitf1re February 9th, 2003, 8:51 pm When Harry rebounded Voldemort's Avada Kedavra curse, the books say that Voldemort fled, with his body destroyed and all. I want to know how he got his wand back at the end of Goblet of Fire. It says that the Potter's house was blown up, and that Hagrid pulled him out of the rubble. Wouldn't have Voldemort's wand been destroyed too?
EvilMeghan February 9th, 2003, 8:55 pm Good thread, Spitf1re! I think wands are sort of powerful and don't get destroyed that easily (but they can break - like Ron's). Maybe Wormtail got it back for him?
1MelissaPotter February 9th, 2003, 8:57 pm Yea EvilMeghan, I think maybe he had someone get it, but not Peter, because where would he have kept the wand if he was with the Weasleys for all that time?
EvilMeghan February 9th, 2003, 9:04 pm Good point...and I don't think Wormtail would do anything for Voldie if he knew he was not powerful. Maybe someone like the Lestranges picked it up...but then where did they keep the wand for 13 years?
Rowena Ravenclaw February 9th, 2003, 9:12 pm Hmm...if I thought Voldemort had more trust in him, I'd be tempted to suggest Lucius kept it in his basement.
Maybe Wormtail did manage to retrieve it from the rubble of the Potters' house and found a safe place for it before his confrontation with Sirius.
EvilMeghan February 9th, 2003, 9:27 pm Did Pettigrew take Voldie's wand for himself? I believe they sent his mother his finger and his wand, so maybe it was kept in his mother's Gringotts vault?
Just rambling...
Camo February 9th, 2003, 11:43 pm Maybe Peter used the 'Accio' spell/charm and the wand was not locked up very tightly and it flew to him from wherever it was. Underground in the rubble perhaps?
Aramis Diggle February 10th, 2003, 12:44 am I believe that when Voldemort's body was destroyed, so was his wand. When he brought his body back, everything that was in his robes, i.e. his wand, came back. Just a thought.
bubblesofdeath88 February 10th, 2003, 12:45 am Maybe barty crouch did because he was convicted of trying to find his master ya know? he could have been trying to find him to return his wand to him. Or maybe when peter returned to him he might have sent him to godrics hollow to find it for him.
ilovelifex1000 February 10th, 2003, 2:28 am I believe Crouch Jr. is the more likely person to have found his wand. Peter had no place to keep it and Voldie was, well he didn't have a body. I can't remember if it says that Peter handed him his wand back or not.
Nope it says " Voldemort sipped one of those unnaturally long-fingered hands into a deep pocket and drew out a wand" ch 33 first page. Then he caresses it or whatever. The robe had previously been laying on the floor and Peter picked it up. So someone, somehow found not only his wand, but his robes before the MoM came to check out the Potter's place. Before Hagrid retrieved Harry.
kit February 10th, 2003, 2:29 am Interesting thread, and a very good question.
We know that until Wormtail returns to Voldemort in GoF that none of the death eaters are in contact with Voldemort. They are no doubt aware of his continuing existence but not of his location or his state. It's possible that one of these other deatheaters managed to save Voldys wand from the ruin of the Potters house, but then how would Voldemort have had acquired it when he was "reborn"? The only death eater present was Wormtail when Voldy first pulled out his wand, and at that point while the deatheaters knew of his return, none had seen him or had a chance to return his wand to him.
Yet, it can't have been wormtail who kept it safe for the 13 years. He had no reason to and he will only do something if he will gain from it.
My guess is that one of the death eaters, or perhaps someone at the MoM picked up the wand and stored it. Most likely a death eater, because surely the MoM would have destroyed the wand. And when Wormtail returned to serve Voldemort he simply stole his wand back for him.
Edit: Ugh, just read ilovelifex1000's post.
I completely forgot about Crouch. That makes perfect sense. He had the opportunity, the means and the reason. Yes, he spent time in Azkaban, but there is no reason to believe that before his imprisionment he didn't conceal Voldemorts wand in anticipation for his return. Once he was free from his fathers spell and returned to Voldys service, he would definitely return the wand.
Perfect sense. I can't believe I missed it. I'll have to go and re-read GoF.
daredevildiver13 February 10th, 2003, 11:41 pm I have been wondering the same thing. How did Voldemort do Avada Kedavra on Frank Bryce without a proper body?
Spitf1re February 11th, 2003, 1:08 am In regards to killing Frank Bryce; wasn't Voldie like in the body of like that little baby-sized-creature thing. He might've been able to use a wand. Most likely Wormtail USED Voldemort's wand to kill him. That's why he showed in the 'Priori Incantatem' chapter.
miri March 6th, 2003, 1:31 am I was wondering about this thing for a while!
I'd happily accept that they got replacement robes but it was definitely his original wand. I dont think we know enough about the timing of everything to say it was definitely Barty Crouch Jr who kept the wand safe - were all the Pensieve trails after Voldemort's demise? Coz i thought that they started before..?
dorcasderr March 7th, 2003, 11:38 pm I think the trials started after Voldemort's disappearance because he was too powerful for that kind of opposition before his disappearance. Barty Crouch, jr. seems like a perfect choice for wand-saver to me too. Since after his escape from his father, he knew that Voldemort was trying to return (we know this because Voldemort himself says his faithful servant is working for him at Hogwarts). So, that proves that there was communication between them and for all we know they were able to meet, so Barty, jr. could return his wand to him.
GodricSlytherin March 8th, 2003, 4:53 am I think that Peter might have gone with Voldy to the Potter's house. He was there when BOOM! The house explodes. He looks for his wand as a rat and he grabs it and crawls away and puts it in a secret place for when Voldy comes or he can pick it up.
Sorting Hat's Songwriter March 8th, 2003, 12:04 pm barty crouch cant be wand saver. Bertha Jorkins anyone? Voldy had his wand back to kill bertha before he knew crouch jr was even alive!!! So, this leaves pettigrew, i think the theory of his mother getting his finger and wand back, and the wand being voldy's is the best. then pettigrew could have retrieved it before goin to find voldy. the only problem bein, how did he avoid being seen??? im sure we'll find out, coz it places someone else (pettigrew) in godric's hollow on that fateful halloween night..... also, voldy was returned to a primitive body by wormtail, so he killed bertha and frank coz he could hold a wand.
Alastor March 8th, 2003, 2:07 pm I agree that Barty jr couldn't have been the wand saver. Bertha was killed before Voldy and Peter left the Albanian forest. No chance to meet Barty before that.
So the only wand saver left is Peter. But how?
Ashkins March 8th, 2003, 2:22 pm Maybe Peter was there at Godrics Hollow and saw everything happen. How else would Voldie know where the Potters were?? Peter presumably had to lead him.
Peter could have picked up Voldemorts things and fled. Hide the stuff then faced Sirius. It is assumed Peter and Sirius fought that very same night. Or the next.
Padfoot127 March 8th, 2003, 3:22 pm It's possible that Voldemort could have bought a new one, or stole someone else's, like Quirrel's after he got blown to pieces!
hpangel102 March 8th, 2003, 5:27 pm I don't think its possible for Voldemort to get a new one. 1. There wasn't any other wand like its kind besides Harry's, and 2. who would have gotten it for him? Honestly, he would have had to be there to get it, or else the wand would have been fit for someone else. and 3. At the end of Gof, it would have had to be the same wand, because of the thing that happened with Harry's wand and his.
bubblesofdeath88 March 8th, 2003, 6:47 pm Yes voldemort did kill bertha, but he could have been using peters wand until he found barty, and he returned his true wand to him.
smartypants March 8th, 2003, 7:08 pm I got the feeling Whats-his-name was naked after he got his body back. Isn't there hints of that? Somebody probably kept it for him. It could very well be wormtail, because when you transfigure into an animal, your clothes seem to transfigure with you, and then why not some extra stuff like wands.
And I surely have no problem with Lucius Malfoy storing it. He did have his diary, and if oldmort trusted him or not is a moot point, Voldemort didn't give him the wand, he just kept it, if that's the case.
Sorting Hat's Songwriter March 9th, 2003, 2:55 am sorry bubbles but voldy didnt use wormtails wand to kill bertha. Bertha came out of voldys wand remember? I think wormtail WAS at godrics hollow at some point after voldy was stumped by little harry potter. but how he stored/retrieved it is causing me to lose sleep! its 3 am in england!!! ive got to get a definitive theory for this one coz its been buggin me for months!!!!
Alastor March 9th, 2003, 7:29 am All those ppl whose shadows came out of the wand was killed by that very same wand. That's clear enough. And yes, Voldy was naked and Peter had just before used that same wand to kill Cedric. Obviously Peter put that wand in in the pocket of the robes he had ready for Voldy.
And if Peter was at Godric's Hollow with Voldy, he must have left and came back later. Because Sirius was alone there when Hagrid met him.
Sorting Hat's Songwriter March 9th, 2003, 4:00 pm not necessarily with voldy. he could have heard (like sirius) gone to see what happened, retrieved the wand and run away. Sirius then arrives, meets Hagrid, Hagrid takes Harry, and Sirius, realising who betrayed them ('You take it Hagrid, I wont need it any more' ie he was goin to murder peter) gets on peters tail (sorry, no pun intended) and when he catches him, we all know what happened then. Only problem is still where peter stored the wand. I think possibly he used voldys wand to blow the street up, and his mother got it back with his finger, and the order of merlin.
Sorting Hat's Songwriter March 9th, 2003, 4:01 pm But no!!! coz then we would have seen an echo of the explosion peter caused when priori incantetem happened!! Grrrr this is hurting my head!!!
EvilMeghan March 9th, 2003, 5:12 pm OOO - stroke of genious!! OK, listen to my new theory:
After the Potters were killed, the place was probably swarming with MoM people, who confiscated Voldy's wand, robes, etc. - whatever was left. Crouch Jr., through his father's connections, or maybe even through his father (using the Imperious Curse), retreived all these articles and kept them in his possesion. He may have left them at his house, hidden under a floorboard, like Harry and his cake. So when he was taken out of Azkaban, the stuff was still there waiting for him. He probably carried it with him to the World Cup and had it with him when he went to Moody's place. He was obviously in contact with Voldy in order to set up the portkey, so he probably gave Wormtail the stuff to hold then. YAY! A theory that could work!
Daily Propheter March 9th, 2003, 7:31 pm After the Potters were killed, the place was probably swarming with MoM people, who confiscated Voldy's wand, robes, etc. - whatever was left. Crouch Jr., through his father's connections, or maybe even through his father (using the Imperious Curse), retreived all these articles and kept them in his possesion. He may have left them at his house, hidden under a floorboard, like Harry and his cake. So when he was taken out of Azkaban, the stuff was still there waiting for him. He probably carried it with him to the World Cup and had it with him when he went to Moody's place. He was obviously in contact with Voldy in order to set up the portkey, so he probably gave Wormtail the stuff to hold then.
That's what I always thought as well.
smartypants March 9th, 2003, 7:41 pm Originally posted by EvilMeghan
After the Potters were killed, the place was probably swarming with MoM people, who confiscated Voldy's wand, robes, etc. - whatever was left. Crouch Jr., through his father's connections, or maybe even through his father (using the Imperious Curse), retreived all these articles and kept them in his possesion. He may have left them at his house, hidden under a floorboard, like Harry and his cake. So when he was taken out of Azkaban, the stuff was still there waiting for him. He probably carried it with him to the World Cup and had it with him when he went to Moody's place. He was obviously in contact with Voldy in order to set up the portkey, so he probably gave Wormtail the stuff to hold then. YAY! A theory that could work!
Except that Barty jr comes to the attention of Voldemort through Bertha Jorkins, so then he has to go to Barty first and THEN kill Bertha, which seems strange.
Yup, I think JK Rowing will have trouble expaining this too. :)
HPviolinist85 March 9th, 2003, 10:33 pm After the Potters were killed, there was probably a gap between the time that Sirius found them dead and when they were actually killed. Someone could have gone into their house and taken Voldemort's things.
HPviolinist85 March 9th, 2003, 10:34 pm wait, i have a small rebuttle to my last post, if they took Voldemort's things, wouldn't they have taken Harry away too if they were a Voldemort supporter. Wow, this is really complicated.
EvilMeghan March 10th, 2003, 3:17 am Where does it say that Crouch found Voldy after he killed Berthy? I thought the time he contacted Voldy was a bit vague. We only know for certain it was before Frank Bryce.
miri March 10th, 2003, 4:55 am I would suggest something obscure like *maybe they transfigured the wand into Harry's scar and then when they retrieved the blood got the essence needed to reform the wand* but it doesnt make any sense, and Voldy had the wand before then!
I do find it odd that Voldy's wand was kept safe and Harry was left alive. I think it points to Wormtail tho - after seeing a baby apparently kill the greatest magician, would you try to kill that baby?
I dont think Peter had the self-confidence to face the boy who lived. An elaborate disapearing act involving severing 2 of his own fingers off seems out of character enough for him - sounds painful and he's a coward - but I dont think it was an accident... grabbing the wand, turning into a rat and heading for the nearest sewer entrance is far more his style
Sorting Hat's Songwriter March 10th, 2003, 12:15 pm Voldy only found out about crouch being alive from Bertha, so he definitely killed bertha before contacting crouch. It does raise a lot of questions about what went on at godrics hollow that night, and what happened in the 'missing' 24 hours. JK will prob reveal all, we just gotta wait......
hermiones mum March 11th, 2003, 7:11 am When it is explained who was at Godrics Hollow on that night, I am sure it will make sense. However, lots od hidden vaults/storage areas have appeared why not a Voldys one. Peter would have been able to get to it as a rat (possibly the hope that it would make him a greater wizard!).
smartypants March 11th, 2003, 6:49 pm Originally posted by EvilMeghan (original post (http://www.cosforums.com/a/showthread.php?postid=207375#post207375))
Where does it say that Crouch found Voldy after he killed Berthy?
Because otherwise he would have travelled with Bertha to England to meet with Barty and then killed Bertha. It seems very far fetched.
Alastor March 12th, 2003, 8:05 am Where does it say that Crouch found Voldie after he killed Bertha?
In GoF ch. 35.
Quote: "Now it was just Father and I, alone in the house. And then........My master came for me". Unquote.
And that is after Winky had been dismissed. Which means it was later than the world cup AND later than the murder of Frank Bryce.
Jessica March 13th, 2003, 12:36 am THEORY ONE
The wand chooses the wizard, right?
Maybe there is some kind of bond between wizard and wand and even is his half dead state Voldemort was able to keep it near him somehow.
THEORY TWO
How did Voldemort leave. Maybe somebody came to help him and took the wand with?
Alastor March 13th, 2003, 7:05 am Jessica, I might bet a knut on THEORY ONE, But not on the other. Didn't Voldie himself say that nobody ever came to help him before Wormtail came 12 years later?
Jessica March 13th, 2003, 11:05 pm You're right. I re-read that part of four last night so I'm retracting Theory Two
smartypants March 14th, 2003, 11:37 am Although Voldemort is rather weak in his strange "foetus" stage he still is able to kill both Bertha and that old man I forgot the name of at the moment... and Avada Kedavra requires strong magic. So maybe, after he got into this semi-body he could call upon the wand with a powerful summoning charm to get it back?
Alastor March 15th, 2003, 7:14 am But then again you need a wand for the summoning.
Spitf1re March 16th, 2003, 7:50 pm Hmmm. Im still wondering how Voldemort killed Bertha Jorkins with his wand. Barty Crouch couldn't have had it because Bertha was killed with it before they come to him.
I'll bet 10 galleons that Pettigrew killed Bryce. With the Priori Incantatem, it shows what spells the wand performed, not the just the spells of a particular wizard.
Also, Pettigrew and Voldemort could have stolen Bertha's wand. It says in the books that "The wand chooses the wizard." But it also says that "you wont get the same results with anothers wand." Doesn't this mean that a wizard CAN use any wand?
Im still confused...
Kendra March 16th, 2003, 8:03 pm Maybe, this is where book 2 comes in. Tom Riddle is alive in the diary, with the wand, so perhaps that surviving, it allows the wand to survive somehow? But then again, it doesn't explain what happened after the Diary was destroyed.
Oh and HPviolinist, they wouldn't have taken Harry away because it would have been too suspicious. Woah...woah...woah REWIND!
Remember the beginning of book1 , how people knew harry finished off voldie, how did they know? Voldie COULD have just tried to curse Harry another way and fled, but for them to know what happened, there must hve been a trace of voldie left. In that case, if they took Harry, then it would have meant 2 corpses, something of voldie left but no Harry, it would also be very hard to hide Harry because of the search, and also the owl of Hogwarts I suspect would have defenately found him. They also wouldn't have taken him, they would have probably killed him!
Alastor March 17th, 2003, 7:15 am Originally posted by helhorns (original post (http://www.cosforums.com/a/showthread.php?postid=216606#post216606))
Maybe, this is where book 2 comes in. Tom Riddle is alive in the diary, with the wand, so perhaps that surviving, it allows the wand to survive somehow?
How's that?
In the chamber he picked Harry's wand from the floor. And it was clearly stated that he used Harry's wand when he wrote I am Lord Voldemort in the air.
Kendra March 17th, 2003, 6:20 pm 1 moment...*waddles off to get book 2*
Oh yes, well forget that idea then lol, I forgot it was Harry's wand!
miri March 17th, 2003, 6:23 pm A wizard can definitely use anothers' wand - unless it's been mangled to the extent that NO ONE can use it without risking severe back-fireage!
Maybe the DEs were too shocked that Voldie was gone to kill Harry? Or too freaked out to try to kill the baby that had destroyed their dark master? Probably too scared to touch him or point a wand at him!
Jaded_Wanderer March 18th, 2003, 8:31 am hmmmm...I'm VERY confused...I do however, have 2 thoughts on the matter:
1. Isn't Lucius Malfoy a member of the MoM? I can't quite remember whether he is or not, but i should imagine he is a fairly important person in whatever he does - he obviously has contacts where he can get dark items from (Borkins or whatever that shop in Knockturn Alley was called perhaps?).
2. (fairly far fetched, and I can't see it happening, but it's an idea all the same...) Is Sirius Black really innocent?? Because if by some strange twist he isn't, maybe he was the one who picked the wand up - we know he was already there when Hagrid arrived, so he would have had the opportunity...but what of the motive? Maybe he picked it up so that it wouldn't find its way back into bad hands? No I have no idea where I'm going with this, hope it at least makes sense!! Byes!
Alastor March 18th, 2003, 1:23 pm 1 There is no mention abt Lucius' profession. He seems to be living on inherited money. He has influence, but that's because he is rich and of an old family.
2 It was made clear enough in GoF that Peter was the one who betrayed the Potters and blew up the street killing those muggles. The wand found it's way back in bad hands, yes, but there is no reason to think Sirius helped there.
smartypants March 18th, 2003, 4:09 pm Originally posted by Alastor D (original post (http://www.cosforums.com/a/showthread.php?postid=214453#post214453))
But then again you need a wand for the summoning.
Yes, but you can use somebody else wand. It just doesn't work as well.
Either Voldemort used Worktails wand, or wormtail did the summoning, or they did it together somehow, if neither of them was strong enough.
miri March 18th, 2003, 5:40 pm I think if the MoM had found it, Voldemort's wand would have been destroyed.
I dont know how it got back to Voldemort. Was hoping maybe his name would give some clue - mortis means corpse, death, annhilation... couldnt fine a vold-some word!
EvilMeghan March 18th, 2003, 10:42 pm Could it be that a character we have not yet met had the wand in his/her possession? Because most of the people we can think of don't work...
Hermoine March 18th, 2003, 11:15 pm When I first read Malfoy saying they had things stored under the floor in his castle, the first thing that jump to my mind was "Voldy's wand" but that wouldn't explain how Voldy would have gotten his wand back.
Maybe the wand seeks the wizard out?
Any thoughts?
miri March 19th, 2003, 12:31 am Originally posted by jessicacarstens (original post (http://www.cosforums.com/a/showthread.php?postid=211334#post211334))
THEORY ONE
The wand chooses the wizard, right?
Maybe there is some kind of bond between wizard and wand and even is his half dead state Voldemort was able to keep it near him somehow.
really great theory!
I dont think it's quite like the *one ring to rule them all* in it's quest to get back to its master but...
I think maybe he wouldnt have needed that strong a summoning charm to summon something that wanted to be with him.
smartypants March 19th, 2003, 7:45 am I don't know if wants seek their wizards out, but I would imagine that the connection between a wizard and the wand would make it easier to find it somehow. For example, summoning charms on your wand may be much easier than on other objects, maybe?
Alohamora March 19th, 2003, 8:29 am harry must have some relation with voldermort to have had the same wand as him. but the thing that i dont get is fawkes being the soul bearer of the feather in both the wands. could this have any relationship with these two...AND OF COURSE THE WAND CHOOSES THE WIZARD :banghead: :wacky:
Barbara Kennedy April 7th, 2003, 3:37 am We have all been assuming that Voldemort went to the Potters home ALONE, but suppose he had more than one [read 'several'] Death Eaters there, surrounding the house, while he went inside?
Wouldn't at least one of them think to gather any evidence left behind as they fled, including Voldemort's wand?
Starseyer April 7th, 2003, 4:50 am Don't you think one of the death eaters could have tried to finish Harry off if they were still there. Or maybe they were so shocked they just didn't think of it. Or afraid that the same would happen to them if they tried to kill him.
( :clappy: This post makes me a second year!!!:clappy: )
Barbara Kennedy April 7th, 2003, 4:54 am Somehow I went to third year today, didn't notice when....
Then again I was too busy posting to notice, lol.
smartypants April 7th, 2003, 11:38 am Originally posted by Alohamora (original post (http://www.cosforums.com/a/showthread.php?postid=220198#post220198))
harry must have some relation with voldermort to have had the same wand as him.
Uhm.... no he doesn't have to have some relation at all. There is no indication wands chooze their wizard because of relations.
And besides, he doesn't have the same wand, he has it's brother. :)
Barbara Kennedy April 8th, 2003, 6:16 am Originally posted by smartypants (original post (http://www.cosforums.com/a/showthread.php?postid=255838#post255838))
Uhm.... no he doesn't have to have some relation at all. There is no indication wands chooze their wizard because of relations.
And besides, he doesn't have the same wand, he has it's brother. :)
Of course, you're right smartypants, there are two diferent wands. How else did the wands interact in the end of GoF?
Morgoth May 6th, 2003, 5:10 pm *bump*
H0gwartz May 6th, 2003, 11:53 pm i doubt JKR even thought about it when writing it were jsut using our imaginations.
dobbyhassecrets May 6th, 2003, 11:54 pm actually it was stated, i can't remember exactly where (my sister has the book right now) but somewhere when either hagrid was telling him about voldie or when harry over heard the teacher's conversation at that restraunt or something like that. It went something like this: And when we searched the house we found james and lily dead and you just lying there. Voldemort however was not to be found, blah blah and then it said that his wand was nowhere to be found. Which leads to the question how.
Also, i would like to add that that was probably the worst quotation of the harry potter book series, and therefore, highly inaccurate.
Once i get the book back, i quote the whole thing word for word. Sorry!
Barbara Kennedy May 11th, 2003, 1:25 am Still the most likely explanation seems to be that one of his supporters was there at Godric's Hollow the night Voldemort killed the Potters. Before anyone else arrived after the place was destroyed they gathered any evidence they could find and escaped, either never knowing Harry was still alive or fearing to attempt to do anything to him themselves.
Voldemort's wand had to have been kept by someone in the meantime, and returned in time for the rebirth ceremony.
smartypants May 12th, 2003, 10:47 am I still like the idea that Voldemort + Wormtail somehow together performed a powerful accio spell to get the wand back.
But that of course does not explain where it was...
Imperio! (Crucio!) May 26th, 2003, 10:04 pm Matbe lucious malfoy was holding it. he already riddles diary and he also says inCOS that he has allot more items which he may not wish for the MoM to see. how he got the wand in the first place? maybe he bought it off a dark arts market or something (with the seller just thinking it was an ordinary wand). really though anyone could have had his wand. wormtail might have retreaved it from the rubble (there was no mention in the books to say that wormtail wasnt with voldie the night of the potters deaths) he could have been in his rat form and burried underneath the rubble to retreive it. he could then have gave it to one of the deatheaters too look fter. wormtail could have also stole it back from the MoM (if they where holding it) i mean i can change into a rat!!! it wouldnt be too hard for him to sneek into the MoM and steal it back. dark magic could even been involved to use a very strond summoning charm or something. there are lots of ways voldermort could have got his wand back. maybe there will be an answer in book 5?
wendelin_the_weird May 26th, 2003, 10:20 pm If Hagrid could get into the house after Voldie's li'le mistake, any of the deatheaters could, and I'm pretty sure the Ministry went to the house and buried Lily and James, and there were tons of DE working for MoM any one of them could have taken it. Cheers:ghost:!
Barbara Kennedy May 30th, 2003, 5:17 am Perhaps he simply used a wand [taken from Bertha Jorkins possibly?] and used the accio charm to call his wand to him from wherever it was.
smartypants May 30th, 2003, 10:37 am Ah, yes, of course!
I had this theory earlier, but I didn't know where he would get the original wand from. If he used Pettigrews wand, why did not Pettigrew use his own wand to kill Cedric? (Yes, I know he used Voldemorts wand to Cedrics 'echo' could ask Harry to bring back his body, but that's stepping outside the story.) So we can assume Pettigrews wand is gone too, right? Perhaps he left it behind at the 'scene of the crime' or something.
And of course, Bertha Jorkins wand comes as a rescuer to this theory! Thanks, now it's complete. :)
Imperio! (Crucio!) May 30th, 2003, 12:03 pm but voldemort didnt know that that was the night that he would loose everything. so wouldnt he have just used his own want to do the £dirty work". and according to priori incantatem. both of harrys parents came out of voldemorts wand. so that wand was used to kill them. so that wand would have been left at the rubble of the potters home. not pettigrews.
smartypants May 30th, 2003, 12:31 pm Uhm, yes. I don't think I understand what your point is. ????
stellaluna August 1st, 2003, 2:42 pm I highly doubt that Voldemort got his wand back by the means of a summoning charm. it would mean taht the wand lay around in Godric's Hollow for 10 (?) years. I don't think that could be. I'm quite sure the house has been searched by Ministry representatives many times to solve the mystery of what had happened to Voldemort. they would have found the wand, I'm sure.
I'm sorry, I didn't read this thread through; I discussed this topic in another thread that was closed now :).
Gilderoy Lockhart August 5th, 2003, 12:39 am Maybe the better question is will JK ever explain it?
nightingale August 5th, 2003, 3:59 pm I don't think that he used a summoning charm, either. If the MoM had his wand, wouldn't they have noticed it missing? (And, as stellaluna says, I don't think it's been lying around Godric's Hollow for 10 years. Someone from the MoM would have found it, I'm sure the place where the greatest dark wizard of all time had been defeated would have been searched for his wand and any remains quite well.) Plus, someone here said that in one of the books Hagrid says that Voldemort's wand was never found; therefore I'm inclined to believe that one of his Death Eaters took it (I mean it wasn't too hard to get in and they had enough time, Sirius got in and so did Hagrid), and kept it for him until his re-birth. But who was it? They all seemed surprised in the end of GoF to see Voldemort back, and I think he had his wand before the Death Eaters apparated around them, so if they had given the wand back to him, shouldn't he/she have known that he was back? Did Voldemort steal the wand from him/her? If so (and I doubt it), why? Was it just that the overall reaction of the Death Eaters was surprise, and this Death Eater feigned it? (Why?) Or that his/her reaction wasn't mentioned? Was it Peter? If so, where exactly did he keep the wand, while he was busy being a rat? Was it a faithful DE that already knew Voldemort's plans and didn't/wasn't supposed to apparate to the graveyard? ...
hesdead-dealwithit August 5th, 2003, 4:32 pm Let's see what we know. First, LV lost his wand and Godric's Hollow. But that wand killed Frank Bryce, Bertha Jorkins, and Cedric Diggory, so he had to have regained the wand sometime before or at the time of when Wormtail arrived. However, the wand had to be taken out of Godric's Hollow before the Ministry arrived, and probably before Sirius and Hagrid arrived. Probably, a DE went in and got it (perhaps there were other DEs surrounding the building?) and then gave it to LV. It would have been destroyed if the Ministry found it. But once a DE has it, its not too hard to give it back to LV. If it was wormtail, he could have given it when he arrived. This I doubt - he's not the type to go back to where he betrayed Lilly and James that night. However, there are other ways of giving the wand to LV. Instead of LV summoning it, how about - wait for it - the DE banishing it to LV? He could also send it via owl. (This brings up a whole new topic. You would think that since Harry could send owls to Sirius, the MoM could do the same and follow the owls. The same could have been done with LV. However, I think, and the consensus is, that owls will not betray the recipients. Someone on the same side as a hiding person will be able to send owls, but someone on the opposite side will not.) Anyway, using an owl is high risk as it could be intercepted. Why not banish the wand to Voldemort? It would take a powerful spell, but it would probably not be intercepted easily. What do you guys think?
stellaluna August 7th, 2003, 4:04 pm Good you found a contra-argument against the point that it was probably Wormtail who found it. But... do you think his moralty is great enopugh when he's up to please his master?
hesdead-dealwithit August 7th, 2003, 4:21 pm Good you found a contra-argument against the point that it was probably Wormtail who found it. But... do you think his moralty is great enopugh when he's up to please his master?
I don't know about his morality - it's just that I think that Wormtail would be too scared to go back to Godric's Hollow. Scared of Sirius, mostly. Plus, if he retrieved the wand it had to be almost right away, and before he met Sirius (afterwards would be too late, the MoM would have surrounded the building). If he had it before he met Sirius then he couldn't have taken the wand with him when he transfigured to a rat. (A rat carrying a wand would go very slow and be very conspicuous). I personally can't find any way Wormtail would have gotten the wand in the first place AND kept it after he killed the 13 muggles AND gotten away with it to eventually give it to LV.
kismetgirl November 17th, 2003, 7:12 am I don't think that any death eater had it. B/c would they have not joined up and helped Voldemort with getting a body when he retrieved it.
Could it have been Mr. Ollivander? I don't think it is the wand in the window b/c I don't think he would have kept it that prominently displayed. But twice in the wand buying scene Harry is creeped out about Mr. Ollivander and his shop. And as it is said if Rowling repeats it; it is important. Maybe he is kind of like Swizterland banking. Neutral and confidential.
gig103 November 17th, 2003, 2:58 pm We have to believe that animagus retain the articles in their robes. It would have made sense for Pettigrew to have the wand when he transfigured into Scabbers. Ollivander says that different wands have different qualities based on the wood and core... Peter probably wouldn't have been strong enough to curse that street, but with Voldemort's wand the power might have existed...
JimmyPotter January 3rd, 2004, 4:17 am I think it is clear that the wand Voldemort has now is the same wand he had before he lost his powers when he tried to kill baby Harry. There is the Priori Incantatum that caused the emergence of Cedric, Frank Bryce, Bertha Jorkins, Lily Potter, and James Potter, in that order (in the revised editions).
The only deatheater who could have returned Voldemort's wand to him is Wormtail. He's the only one who got with Voldemort before they came across Bertha.
Perhaps Wormtail went by Lily and James' house after Voldemort tried to kill Harry and finds the wand. Wormtail then picks up the wand and gets out of there before Sirius and Hagrid arrive. At this point Wormtail has his own wand and Voldemort's wand.
When Sirius catches up with Wormtail, Wormtail uses his own wand to create the explosion and sever his finger while he keeps Voldemort's wand in his pocket. Wormtail's wand and finger are left on the ground while he turns into a rat with Voldemort's wand in his possession.
Zachary1993 January 3rd, 2004, 5:26 am When Harry rebounded Voldemort's Avada Kedavra curse, the books say that Voldemort fled, with his body destroyed and all. I want to know how he got his wand back at the end of Goblet of Fire. It says that the Potter's house was blown up, and that Hagrid pulled him out of the rubble. Wouldn't have Voldemort's wand been destroyed too?
One of his servents probably gave it back to him or something.
Xylia May 21st, 2004, 1:30 am Ahhh. . . but what if Voldemort never did get his wand back :eyebrows: . What if the wand he has now is not really his. It would explain why he looked so scared when the ghosts came out during the priori incantatem.
Adrelamas May 21st, 2004, 3:27 am The simpliest answer is usually the most correct. Pettigrew was at the Potter house when things went 'BOOM', for Voldemort.
Now, I'm fairly certain of this. Why? Well, does Voldemort strike anyone as a trusting sort of fellow? Is he going to go up to Pettigrew, and say, 'Give me an address' and whatever address Peter spits out, Voldemort runs off to? What if Peter doesn't have the courage to betray his friends? No, Voldemort would make Peter SHOW him where the Potters were hiding. So Peter was there, and when things went bad, he grabbed Voldemort's wand, and ran. It also fits in why whoever took the wand didn't try to kill Harry. Pettigrew wouldn't have taken such a risk.
It makes further sense, since wands obviously transform with their animagus, (how else does Sirius keep his wand with him when he's running around as Snuffles?) so, why would Peter give up his own wand, when he faked his death, unless he had another to protect himself with. They don't search Peter when he returns to human form in PoA, so he could have Voldemort's wand on him. Why doesn't he use it? Outnumbered 5 to 1? He'd never risk it. So he kept it hidden with him, and when he fled back to Voldemort, he returned the wand to it's rightful owner.
Baron_G May 21st, 2004, 4:12 am Pettigrew would have had to be observing from a safe distance to have avoided the explosion that totalled the house.
I'm more partial to the opinion that a DE was sent there (were the rumours already flying around?) and arrived after Hagrid and Sirius and the only sign of the dark lord found among the wreckage there was the wand which Hagrid hadn't seen. (If he had arrived before Hagrid, Harry would be dead) Then he probably took it to DE HQ and showed it to the others and left it there after they had all decided to flee.
Had Quirrell later retrieved the wand for Voldemort and used it, it may have been lost at Hogwarts. I think after the Quirrel failure, Wormtail may have been sent back to England to fetch the wand while Voldemort kept 'possession' of Bertha Jorkins. Or likelier still, he stopped by the old DE HQ for some clue to Voldemort's whereabouts and found the wand. Still a shaky theory though I tried sticking to canon. There are few ways in which the wand could have followed Voldemort to Albania.
Elocin4684 May 21st, 2004, 4:47 am Well, we have to think... let's see, we know Hagird showed up to rescue Harry when the house went boom that faithful night. If Dumbledore knew enough to send Hagrid before anybody else showed up (which is really fast), then we know Dumbledore knew before most people. But then, Hagrid ran into Black on his way there, so, either the wizarding community knew when Dumbledore did what had happened or somehow Black found out about it ahead of everybody else like Dumbledore did. Now, if Dumbledore and Black could find out so fast, we know that Voldie's people could have known even before they did because atleast some of them would have known that Voldie was going there. We atleast know that Pettigrew knew of him going there. For all we know, Pettigrew was with him waiting outside and snatched the wand and ran out of there before Hagrid showed up.
Now, this doesn't explain where he had kept the wand. So let's look at where we have seen Voldie:
We saw in first in PS, but, as he was attached to somebody else, he would not have had his own wand.
We then saw him in CoS, but he was not the present Voldie but a manifistation from a diary, and, therefore, used Harry's wand at the end. If Harry's wand was so close to his, he should have had an easy time using it (theoretically).
Let's see... I don't think we ever really see him in PoA.
Then there's GoF, which we know he had his wand then. Pettigrew didn't leave the Weasleys' until PoA, so that only leaves about a year for him to find the wand.
I want to subscribe to 2 theories:
1.) Somebody like Malfoy got the wand from the house and has been hiding it all these years.
2.) Voldie had this covered, much like his ability to "never die", and had a contengency plan to take care of his wand in case he ever lost it.
Alastor May 21st, 2004, 5:09 am Ahhh. . . but what if Voldemort never did get his wand back :eyebrows: . What if the wand he has now is not really his. It would explain why he looked so scared when the ghosts came out during the priori incantatem.
The Priori Incantatem needs 'brother' wands. Fawkes never gave more than two feathers, so the only brother to Harry's wand that ever existed is the one Ollivander sold to Tom Riddle long ago. He must have looked scared for some other reason. Maybe he didn't know that Harry had the brother wand?
And Elocin, I think your theory 2.) is better than 1.) because he had the wand already in the Riddle House scene. I have the impression that he had not at that stage told anybody about his return.
mirandam May 21st, 2004, 6:16 am A few of you have said what I would say, Pettigrew was forced by Voldemort to go to Godrics Hollow with him. I think that Pettigrew was in the house when they were killed, probrably cowering in a corner someplace. I believe the house was on fire, and that Pettigrew took the wand. He would of been able to transform and get away without anyone seeing him. I do believe that when they transform to the animagus state that their wands are still with them. The dark mark was over the house after the attack. Hagrid came there and was able to get Harry out, then I believe Sirius then showed up. I am not sure what the time frame was before Hagrid took Harry to the Dursleys, I think this has been discussed before. I think that Pettigrew gave Voldemort the wand back when he found him again. This to me seems to be the only logical answer. Dumbledore did not seem to question that Voldemort had his wand when Harry explained about the echo's. I am sure that JKR will say something about this in her story, or she may not feel that it is important.
smartypants May 21st, 2004, 11:40 pm The simpliest answer is usually the most correct. Pettigrew was at the Potter house when things went 'BOOM', for Voldemort.
Now, I'm fairly certain of this. Why? Well, does Voldemort strike anyone as a trusting sort of fellow? Is he going to go up to Pettigrew, and say, 'Give me an address' and whatever address Peter spits out, Voldemort runs off to? What if Peter doesn't have the courage to betray his friends? No, Voldemort would make Peter SHOW him where the Potters were hiding. So Peter was there, and when things went bad, he grabbed Voldemort's wand, and ran. It also fits in why whoever took the wand didn't try to kill Harry. Pettigrew wouldn't have taken such a risk.
It makes further sense, since wands obviously transform with their animagus, (how else does Sirius keep his wand with him when he's running around as Snuffles?) so, why would Peter give up his own wand, when he faked his death, unless he had another to protect himself with. They don't search Peter when he returns to human form in PoA, so he could have Voldemort's wand on him. Why doesn't he use it? Outnumbered 5 to 1? He'd never risk it. So he kept it hidden with him, and when he fled back to Voldemort, he returned the wand to it's rightful owner.
A good idea. But my quetion is: Where is Pettigrews wand?
Drusilla May 22nd, 2004, 12:02 am Sirius didn't have a wand of his own in PoA.He confiscated Ron's wand in the Shrieking Shack,and used that to disarm Harry and Hermione when they appeared.
As for Voldemort's wand,even though it's most probable that Voldemort went alone to Godric's Hollow that night,it's also probable that in the wake of Voldemort's disappearance,Pettigrew went to the ruined house to check on the situation before Sirius caught up with him,and that he retrieved and hid Voldemort's wand "before the Muggles started swarming around"-most likely a while after Hagrid and Sirius had left,because Voldemort had his wand before he met all the other Death Eaters-the only one he was with till the time in the cemetary was Pettigrew,who probably hid the wand somewhere while he was in rat form.
Adrelamas May 23rd, 2004, 1:31 am A good idea. But my quetion is: Where is Pettigrews wand?
Quite simple, Pettigrew didn't have one, when he returned to human form in PoA. (At least, one that he showed.) If you're asking about where his wand was, well, he faked his own death with it, which is how Sirius was framed, and it was sent to his mother, along with a finger. What SHE did with the the wand from there is anyone's guess.
He had to steal one from Ron, (possibly Lupin) in order to make his escape.
Achilles May 23rd, 2004, 1:53 am A question possibly answered in book six. if anyone hasnt had the chance yet, go to JK Rowling's new website. www.jkrowling.com. Its very interesting. :) Finally good to join a forum, hopefully this will be a chance to have interesting convo's with Harry fans all over the world.
:cool:
"Do you know what's waiting beyond that beach? Immortality! Take it! It's yours!" Achilles
feshnie May 25th, 2004, 3:24 pm Good thread, Spitf1re! I think wands are sort of powerful and don't get destroyed that easily (but they can break - like Ron's). Maybe Wormtail got it back for him?
You might be right but wasn't he on the run. I dont think he has enough time to scramble through the ruined house to get Voldemorts wand. Wouldn't Lily and James wands be there too?
Elocin4684 May 26th, 2004, 6:50 am well, Voldie has his wand somehow, and we can be assured that he made sure that he got his wand back if he "almost died".
If he had a plan to ressurect his own body, then he knew something might happen to his wand if he lost his body, so I'm sure he thought of it. I doubt he left it up to one of his cronies just chancing to go to the place where he lost his body and find his wand from what ever powerful spell could kill him.
smartypants May 27th, 2004, 12:19 am You are right of course. Very clever. You must be in Ravenclaw too. ;)
Yeah, Voldemort had planned for this. He traveked the world to gain immortality, and obviously one of the things he tried worked, since he didn't die (I think he even sais this in book 4, or?) so of course he has a plan for the wand too.
Pettigrew didn't. Still find it bit strange though.
Mugsy June 27th, 2004, 4:51 pm Why can't Pettigrew have been the one to get it? He's just a snivling little servant. I think there a few good reasons why Pettigrew would have it. 1. He was the Secret Keeper..so only those he told would know where to find the Potters. It's never been said that anyone else knew. 2. He's a follower, not a leader. He's the only DE I can think of that going into the house to get the wand and cloak, wouldn't be able to kill Harry. The other DE's have shown they are very much capable of trying at least. 3. While he's none to bright, he does have his moments like with Bertha Jorkins, and not having seen LV's body..thought he might still be alive. He obviously went on the run soon after that from both Sirius and fellow DE's. He could've stored it anywhere. And having heard rumors and absolutely no where else to go, he finally returned to his master. Having the wand and now the ability to restore his master would be enough for LV not to kill him. Although he still had penance to pay.
If another DE had it, wouldn't they have tried to return it to LV? The only people out looking for him all ended up in Azkaban, and he had his wand back before he knew Jr. was out. That's just my thoughts though.
Ivan34 June 28th, 2004, 2:18 am Just read this thread, and some of you make good points, BUT if you remember that DD said that when the 2 wands met in battle and attached to each other like that that the last people of the other end of his last spells came out. The first one was Cedric, and he was killed before Voldy was brought back. Which means that Peter had his wand, Voldy ordered him to "kill the spare" so some how peter got his wand.
Sturgis Podmore June 28th, 2004, 6:38 pm yeah i think Wormtail must have got the wand back and stuffed it into his robes before he changed into a rat? A very good thread though!!
deadsirius August 11th, 2004, 11:05 pm I was going to start a thread like this and somehow someone else thought of it too.(yes I used the search button! :angel: ) this is a great thread and it doesn't look like anyone came to a conclusion!
Angelina X August 12th, 2004, 2:53 am Yes this is a good thread and I like some of the theories floating around. I, too, have wondered how he got his wand back. I'm still wondering.
Alastor D states that "The Priori Incantatem needs 'brother' wands. " I do not think this is true. In Chapter 9 of the GoF Cedric's dad, Amos, performs a Priori Incantatem on the wand that Barty Jr used to cast the Dark Mark. The book does not indicate that these wands were brothers.
I'll keep thinking on this issue. I'm sure JKR will have a clever answer for this one.
One other question someone caused me to think of was how did Hagrid know where the Potters were hiding out. If Sirius and Peter were the only 2 secret keepers - keeping secret the Potters' whereabouts - then how could anyone else know?
Alastor August 12th, 2004, 5:43 am Alastor D states that "The Priori Incantatem needs 'brother' wands. " I do not think this is true. In Chapter 9 of the GoF Cedric's dad, Amos, performs a Priori Incantatem on the wand that Barty Jr used to cast the Dark Mark. The book does not indicate that these wands were brothers.
It's true that Amos forced Harry's wand to show it's latest spell by uttering 'Prior Incantato!', but in the graveyard scene nobody used that spell. The two wands spontaneously refused to 'work properly against each other'. As Dumbledore explained in chapter 36 that happens with 'brother' wands.
Angelina X August 12th, 2004, 6:13 pm It's true that Amos forced Harry's wand to show it's latest spell by uttering 'Prior Incantato!', but in the graveyard scene nobody used that spell. The two wands spontaneously refused to 'work properly against each other'. As Dumbledore explained in chapter 36 that happens with 'brother' wands.
I follow you. I was just saying that u didn't need brother wands to perform the Priori Incantatem. I know you're saying that brother wands forced to work against each other will automatically bring about the priori incantatem against one of the two wands. :blush:
PolarbearInFl August 29th, 2004, 5:43 pm All good points but Voldemort had his wand prior to his rebirth. He used it to kill the Groundskeeper at his father's house. Still a mystery how he got it back.
Tonks04 August 30th, 2004, 1:38 am Well we are talking about voldemort, i mean he abvioulsy can find a way to do anything, he found a way to not die and sure he could find a awy to get his wand back. But remember he said he would possess animals, maybe while he was an animal he went back and got his wand.
Crookshanks800 September 18th, 2004, 6:27 am Here's what I think happened. Wormtail told Voldemort where to find Lily and James. When the Potters house blew up, Wormtail was nearby, knowing that LV was going there to kill them. Wormtail went in, found his master's wand but no master so he took the wand and hid it somewhere before the confrontation with Sirius. After escaping from Sirius and Lupin at end of POA, Wormtail retrieves the wand and heads to Albania to search for his master.
lorna January 15th, 2005, 7:58 pm Well Crookshanks that makes the most sense.
If MOM had found it, surely to god they would have snapped or somehow destroyed the wand.
The timeline does not allow-- without major amounts of speculation-- Malfoy or Crouch to come into possession of the wand.
So we'll hang this one on Wormtail.
weasley January 15th, 2005, 10:34 pm Here's what I think happened. Wormtail told Voldemort where to find Lily and James. When the Potters house blew up, Wormtail was nearby, knowing that LV was going there to kill them. Wormtail went in, found his master's wand but no master so he took the wand and hid it somewhere before the confrontation with Sirius. After escaping from Sirius and Lupin at end of POA, Wormtail retrieves the wand and heads to Albania to search for his master.
I think this theory is most likely, it could explain why it taken about 6 weeks to get to Voldemort. But where could Wormtail have hidden it?
Teatime February 5th, 2005, 5:20 pm The only person who could have given Voldemort his wand back is Pettigrew, because remember, Bertha was murdered with Voldemort's wand before they discovered where Crouch was being kept. And Voldemort didn't have any contact with the other death-eaters, we know this from the graveyard scene in which he apparently meets them all for the first time in 14 (13?) years. However, I just don't see why Peter would bother retrieving Voldie's wand from the potters' home:
1. We know Peter wouldn't risk his neck for something unless there was something in it for him. He's not like the other death-eaters, he may be a coward, but he obviously doesn't relish his work like Bellatrix, for example... he's loyal to Voldie only because he wants to play with the big boys, as Sirius says, and now only because he has no other choice (except for death)
2. Why would Peter retrieve Voldie's wand when he doesn't even bother to look for him again for another 13 or 14 years??
LedZeppelin February 6th, 2005, 3:36 am Voldemort chould have easly just either got a new one or is using someone elses...maybe someone that Wormtail Killed for him...no one ever said that powerfull wizards like him can't use any wand they please.
EDIT** I forgot that voldemorts wand had the phoenix tail feather in it....so yea i guess that does complicate things! lol...
Xantilair February 6th, 2005, 2:00 pm I think that Peter did actually have Voldemort`s wand. When he confronted Sirius he blew the street apart with a blast from a weand concealed behind him. When he transformed and ran away he would have left the extra wand and his own wand behind. The Ministry wizards would have taken both wands when they captured Sirius Black.
All Voldemort would have to do is get someone to retrive his wand from the Ministry when he came to power. Maybe there are still unknown Death Eaters working in the Ministry?
destiney February 6th, 2005, 2:13 pm This is a good point and it seems lots of diffrent views! It is puzzeling about how he got his wand back. I dont think Peter would of had two wands with him when he was "blown up" or jkr would of mentioned it when they had the convo about it in book 3? But i think we should find out about it in the 6th and 7th books becauase we also need to find out what happened to the house? Maybe the ministry went to the house and cleaned up the mess and keeped lily's, James and voldemorts wands and like xantilair said voldemort had de working at the ministry who got his wand for him?
Alastor February 6th, 2005, 3:51 pm I think that Peter did actually have Voldemort`s wand. When he confronted Sirius he blew the street apart with a blast from a weand concealed behind him. When he transformed and ran away he would have left the extra wand and his own wand behind. The Ministry wizards would have taken both wands when they captured Sirius Black.
All Voldemort would have to do is get someone to retrive his wand from the Ministry when he came to power. Maybe there are still unknown Death Eaters working in the Ministry?
But Frank Bryce was killed with Voldemort's wand before he made contact with any Death Eater except Peter.
Xantilair February 20th, 2005, 3:13 pm Yes I know that but how do you know that Peter had not been controlling another MOM witch or wizard who got the wand back. The MOM might not have known it was missing as a replacement might have been left behind at the MOM evidence locker to hide the fact that the original wand had been stolen?
tarachristwen February 21st, 2005, 4:09 am It's possible that Voldemort could have bought a new one, or stole someone else's, like Quirrel's after he got blown to pieces!
i don't think he's able to do so..
maybe barty jr kept it for him...who else?
Diary February 21st, 2005, 6:48 pm I think the reason Peter wasen't in OOTP was because he was trying to get Voldemort's wand back. Then be in hiding. If I remember he used his own one in GOF toressurect Voldy and gave it to him to duel.
Because, in SS Olivander told harry the wand chosses the wizard and that if a wizard used someone's wand then it would cause problems.
mattimusprime February 21st, 2005, 6:58 pm Voldemort used his own wand in the duel at the of GOF. The reason it wen't haywire is because you can't use a wand's twin against the other. Harry and Voldemort share twin wands. My theory to Voldemort getting his own wand back is that Pettigrew or possibly another DE(Lucius Malfoy mentions that he has a lot of dark arts things hidden at his house) was simply keeping it for him.
Tane February 21st, 2005, 7:11 pm I am with those that say Pettigrew got the wand back to Voldemort; he was in rat form and could have very easily sliped past anyone at Godric Hollows. Peter could have very easily hid the wand at the Riddle House before being found by the Weasleys.
victoriakrum February 21st, 2005, 8:26 pm the wand chooses the wizard (or witch) so maybe it finds them too...?
Fawkesified February 21st, 2005, 8:31 pm Voldemort used his own wand in the duel at the of GOF. The reason it wen't haywire is because you can't use a wand's twin against the other. Harry and Voldemort share twin wands. My theory to Voldemort getting his own wand back is that Pettigrew or possibly another DE(Lucius Malfoy mentions that he has a lot of dark arts things hidden at his house) was simply keeping it for him.
As far as I know, the wand itself is not 'Dark Magic'.
skittles2 February 22nd, 2005, 1:03 am Maybe it flew out of the house after the explosion and couldn't be found by anyone because it was dug in or something. And then, after years of Voldy going around becoming snakes and animals and Peter finding him again, he became a little stronger. And as Mr. Ollivander said, not the wizard chooses the wand, but the wand chooses it's owner. So I think maybe the wand found its way back to Voldy after him searching it in his mind or something. I think there is a very close connection from wand to owner and that a wizard can always find his wand because of this connection. Could be, right?
cornish_pixies February 22nd, 2005, 8:58 am I'm think that it was Peter who picked up Voldemort's wand from the rubble and gave it back to him, after he had returned to power. Perhaps he did that whole - faking suicide thing - with Voldemort's wand as well?
skittles2 February 22nd, 2005, 11:04 am Maybe the wand flew away to somewhere because of the explosion when Voldy tried to kill Harry. He was very weak then and fled, knowing that he had to save the little life that was still left in him. But over the years he got stronger and used animals (mainly snakes) as a body until Peter found him again, who then helped Voldy get even stronger. So after a while he wanted his wand back and maybe he searched for it in his mind, maybe he had a feeling where it could be. I think there is a close connection from wizard to wand and that he can always find it because there is something binding them to each other. And a wand chooses its owner, so maybe it's able to find him again when he's lost it. That's what I think.
pipnewkirk April 7th, 2005, 3:46 am okay, let me sum up and see if this is right:
1) Voldemort evaporates after trying to curse Harry, leaving his wand laying in the rubble.
2) Wormtail, who probably accompanied Voldemort to Godric's Hollow, picks up the wand and transforms into a rat, and the wand stays within his rat form, just like his clothes and anything else he might be carrying.
3) Wormtail had Voldemort's wand on him when he blew up the muggles, but didn't use it, otherwise there would have been an echo spell seen in the priori incantatem chapter of GoF.
4) Wormtail's wand and finger was given to his mother. Proof that this is NOT Voldemort's wand is that wands are fairly distinctive looking and Peter's mother probably would have known her own son's wand. Also, the MoM wizards who presented it to her probably would have recognized Voldemort's wand.
5) Wormtail had Voldemort's wand, but not his own, when he is revealed in PoA. There are plenty of reasons for him not to use it. He was outnumbered, it's not his wand and therefore won't be as reliable, and he's a big coward.
6) Wormtail gives Voldemort his wand back when he meets him in Albania.
7) Since Peter's wand is still with his mother, Voldie and Wormtail have only one wand between them, Voldemort's. So whether you think that baby Voldemort is capable of using a wand or not, any spells that the two of them do would have been cast by Voldemort's wand.
8) It will be VERY difficult for Wormtail to ever get another wand that is well suited for him. His wand is at his mother's house, and going there to retrieve it would be big trouble. So would going to Ollivander's for a new one. Unless that silver hand that Voldie conjured for him can work like a wand, he's not ever going to be able to properly duel without revealing himself to the wizarding world.
aish April 7th, 2005, 3:51 am I can' think of anyone other than Peter to give his wand back to him..
P00tyP00twell April 7th, 2005, 4:16 am okay, let me sum up and see if this is right:
1) Voldemort evaporates after trying to curse Harry, leaving his wand laying in the rubble.
2) Wormtail, who probably accompanied Voldemort to Godric's Hollow, picks up the wand and transforms into a rat, and the wand stays within his rat form, just like his clothes and anything else he might be carrying.
3) Wormtail had Voldemort's wand on him when he blew up the muggles, but didn't use it, otherwise there would have been an echo spell seen in the priori incantatem chapter of GoF.
4) Wormtail's wand and finger was given to his mother. Proof that this is NOT Voldemort's wand is that wands are fairly distinctive looking and Peter's mother probably would have known her own son's wand. Also, the MoM wizards who presented it to her probably would have recognized Voldemort's wand.
5) Wormtail had Voldemort's wand, but not his own, when he is revealed in PoA. There are plenty of reasons for him not to use it. He was outnumbered, it's not his wand and therefore won't be as reliable, and he's a big coward.
6) Wormtail gives Voldemort his wand back when he meets him in Albania.
7) Since Peter's wand is still with his mother, Voldie and Wormtail have only one wand between them, Voldemort's. So whether you think that baby Voldemort is capable of using a wand or not, any spells that the two of them do would have been cast by Voldemort's wand.
8) It will be VERY difficult for Wormtail to ever get another wand that is well suited for him. His wand is at his mother's house, and going there to retrieve it would be big trouble. So would going to Ollivander's for a new one. Unless that silver hand that Voldie conjured for him can work like a wand, he's not ever going to be able to properly duel without revealing himself to the wizarding world.
What would be difficult about this idea is that, if this were the case, when Sirius and Remus force him to assume his human shape in POA, why couldn't he just whip out LV's wand and defend himself at any given point during the events of that night? Once the jig was up, he had nothing more to hide. When he saw the chance to escape from Ron and Sirius during Lupin's transformation, why did he dive for Lupin's dropped wand? He should have just taken LV's wand out of his pocket. Perhaps he's thinking, "Well I don't want them to see that I have LV's wand too," but why would he care? For all he knows, his life is on the line, he's got to act, and fast, with whatever means is available to him. Are any of those kids likely to recognize LV's wand? I don't think so.
I think perhaps, if Peter did have it, he must have stowed it away somewhere for safekeeping before he ever went to live with the Weasley's and went to retrieve it before heading off to Albania.
Oy, this is a tough nut to crack...
rhbz April 7th, 2005, 9:14 pm daredevildiver13: He had a body, wormtail made a baby body for him. Didn't look like a baby but the same size etc.
Queen_Beruth April 7th, 2005, 9:37 pm I think the evidence that we have been given at this time points to Pettigrew: he pocketed the wand when V met his downfall.
Wormtail had Voldemort's wand on him when he blew up the muggles, but didn't use it, otherwise there would have been an echo spell seen in the priori incantatem chapter of GoF.
Yes to the first part, no to the second. I think he used it: what else would have the power to kill all those muggles and blast a hole in a street? As for the "echo" as explained by Dumbledore: doesn't D say that more ghosts/echoes would have appeared if the two brother wands had continued to be in contention with each other?
I guess that Pettigrew hid the wand after his Big Goodbye and brought it out again for the return of the Boss.
pipnewkirk April 8th, 2005, 12:43 am I think the evidence that we have been given at this time points to Pettigrew: he pocketed the wand when V met his downfall.
Yes to the first part, no to the second. I think he used it: what else would have the power to kill all those muggles and blast a hole in a street? As for the "echo" as explained by Dumbledore: doesn't D say that more ghosts/echoes would have appeared if the two brother wands had continued to be in contention with each other?
I guess that Pettigrew hid the wand after his Big Goodbye and brought it out again for the return of the Boss.
Peter blasted the hole in the street AFTER Voldemort killed James and Lily. So since the echoes come out in reverse order, there would have been an echo of that spell.
GilleysPheoni May 2nd, 2005, 6:02 am I think wormtail was one of the few who visited godric's hollow after the attack (or maybe went with voldemort) and hid voldemort's wand so he could return it once he regained his powers
Marabout May 27th, 2005, 2:11 am The only thing we really know as fact is that Voldemort had his wand back after being ressurected in GoF. We know this because when he and Harry tried to duel, the wand cores wouldn't allow it.
So we know that his current wand isn't a new one, but the one with the Fawkes feather core that he acquired when starting at Hogwarts.
Sooo.....
Was he carrying a different wand the night he attacked the Potters?
Did one of his servants sneak into the ruins of the house later to get his wand? And if so, who? It would strike me as very odd if the cowardly Wormtail risked his neck to gather the wand of his now defunct master.
Did Mr. Crouch keep the wand as a sort of trophy after the fall of Voldemort?
I think this one is the most likely....Barty Crouch Senior kept the wand as a trophy and his son handed it over when Voldemort made his housecall.
P00tyP00twell May 27th, 2005, 4:31 pm Was he carrying a different wand the night he attacked the Potters?
Probably not, otherwise we wouldn't have the record of his crimes with priori incatatem.
Did one of his servants sneak into the ruins of the house later to get his wand? And if so, who? It would strike me as very odd if the cowardly Wormtail risked his neck to gather the wand of his now defunct master.
Meh, sure he's cowardly and incompetent, but he got into Gryffindor, so he must have some courage in a pinch. And we don't know how much risk was involved in getting the wand, if in fact that's what he did. But it would make sense that if he was still trying to hide his involvement, in a panic he'd snatch up the evidence himself and try to hide it away.
Did Mr. Crouch keep the wand as a sort of trophy after the fall of Voldemort?
I think this one is the most likely....Barty Crouch Senior kept the wand as a trophy and his son handed it over when Voldemort made his housecall.
That actually sounds like the kind of thing Lucius Malfoy would do, not Crouch. Crouch, as a law-abiding Ministry guy, would have seen to it that the wand was snapped (or maybe submitted to the DoM), thus abating further danger of it falling into the wrong hands.
Because of his connection to his wand, is it possible that LV could make his wand be incorporeal when he is? So it only "reappears" when he does? Have we ever seen the wands of dead wizards in the series? I wonder what happens to a wizard's wand when s/he dies?
Lucybird July 1st, 2005, 9:20 pm I didn't read te hole thread so sorry if this has already been mentioned but when Voldy talked about possesing snakes (in GOF I think) he said he found their bodies ill adapted for wand work, suggesting he took his wand with him when he fled from Godric's Hollow
jacktheterror July 11th, 2005, 3:28 pm nope he didnt get a new one hello he forged the connection thingy with the wands. dumbledore said that happened because of the wands being brothers. i would say hed had it all along but didnt the book at one point say he was wandless. i believe he himself said it. he had to have gotten it from pettigrew because who else? or else it came back to him somehow...
dansewell July 12th, 2005, 9:23 pm Their have been loads of threads asking this question (think this is the only one around now) and in the 400 and so days i been here i never seen an answer i think JK has some explaining to do on this one. It has bugged me for ages. My personal beliefe is one of the DE's (asumeing he wasn't alone) picked it up and Malfoy kept it for him but we never know.
Jesus_is_Good July 12th, 2005, 9:32 pm I don't think he ever lost his wand. When he was thrown from power in Godric's Hollow I don't think he stopped having arms. I think he turned into that baby like thing that we see at the end of GoF. Either that or he just picked up a wand from one of his victims, he is the second dmost powerful wizard in the world I don't think using other people's wands is that much of a problem.
DracoLuverTF July 12th, 2005, 9:35 pm He doesnt neccisarily have to have his wand. He could have got any powerful wand and used it. Myabe he stole the wand of one of the people that he killed. Maybe bertha jorkins. Could have been anybodys! OR maybe after he got too weak to carry on he never got ride of his wand. He hid in the forest then maybe when he trnasfere to quirrels body he left his wand in a very distinct place in the forbidden forest and came back for it later on. He's very powerful so a different wand wouldnt make a difference. Dont let harry potter movies confuse ro lie to you. You cant just pick up any old wand and call it your own. You could borrow a wand but never claim one, unless you have a lot of power. Remember it's the wand that chooses the wizard, so u cant choose someone elses wand for yourself.
Muggle_Kyle July 12th, 2005, 9:42 pm I think Peter took Voldemorts wand after his downfall before Hagrid saved Harry. And then carried it with him all the time, until he returned to his master at the end of PoA.
Tonks July 12th, 2005, 9:50 pm I think that he would have to have had HIS wand in the final scene in GoF because if he didn't he could have harmed Harry. It was only because their wands were brothers that they were unable to fight each other.
Now how he got that wand is a totally different story. I stated before that I thought it was in the Malfoy Manor all this time. Perhaps Wormtail picked it up before going to site and slipped it into Voldy's robes?
I hope this becomes a poll question.
hwyla July 13th, 2005, 4:13 am I can't see how it can be anyone other than Peter who gives him back his wand.
1) The wand was not at the Crouches' - Both Frank Bryce then Bertha come out in Prior Incantatum (sp?) then comes Harry's parents - the wand has never been used between. But obviously this means that VM had his wand back by the time he killed Bertha. As has been mentioned before, Bertha was killed before VM arrived at Crouch's house (in Wormtail's arms!) VM was reunited with his wand in Albania.
2) The wand is even less likely to have been at the Malfoys' - from VMs little talk in GoF's graveyard, VM certainly hadn't seen Lucius since before his fall. For the wand to have been at Malfoy's then Wormtail would not only have needed to break in and steal the wand to take it to VM, but he would have needed to have know that Malfoy had it. Peter's been at the Weasleys' and we have clues that Arthur has been working hard to get something on Lucius, but if Arthur knew Malfoy had VMs wand I think he'd have good enough evidence to have arrested him.
3) Peter got the wand from Godric's Hollow - I agree with whomever suggested that VM would insist that Peter go with him. If not just because he didn't trust Wormtail to give him the right address, but the fact that VM didn't go to the Potters' house for a week after the Fidelus Charm could suggest that Peter tried to hide to avoid having to tell VM. If I were VM, I'd take him with me just to be sure Wormtail didn't run off to warn the Potters. The fact that Sirius knew there had been a spy 'close to the Potters' for a year implies a year's worth of DEs attempted attacks with warnings from DDs spy Snape - VM must have been wondering by then if Peter was giving out the warnings.
4) Why didn't Hagrid or Sirius see Peter at Godric's Hollow? It would be very easy for a rat to hide in the demolished house or nearby environs.
5) Why didn't Peter use the wand in PoA - Peter didn't have it with him. He grabbed VMs wand and found somewhere to hide it before becoming the Weasleys' pet. In a hole-in-the-ground? In a sewer? Unknown. Peter never used the wand, so why would he keep it on him?
6) VM could not have used Wormtail's wand to accio his own. - Peter's wand was given to his mother with his finger and the Order of Merlin. And do we really think that even as powerful as VM is could he in his weakened state Accio something in the UK all the way to Albania and how could it have been done without a gazillion muggles and/or wizards having seen a flying wand?
Peter is the simple and obvious answer.
Any other explanation must somehow put that wand in VMs hands before he kills Bertha. I'll consider the idea that VMs wand somehow became insubstantial when VM did, but if that's the case then how did it become substantial again?
Nagini04 July 13th, 2005, 4:19 am Is it possible, that since the "wand chooses the wizard," maybe it remains a part of them even after "death?" Maybe if Harry died, and was brought back to life, he would too return with his wand, because it has forged a deep connection with him, a connection that even "death" cannot destroy. Or maybe, Pettigrew picked it up at the Potter's and kept it hidden for him for all those years?
sneakypadfoot July 13th, 2005, 4:41 am When Harry rebounded Voldemort's Avada Kedavra curse, the books say that Voldemort fled, with his body destroyed and all. I want to know how he got his wand back at the end of Goblet of Fire. It says that the Potter's house was blown up, and that Hagrid pulled him out of the rubble. Wouldn't have Voldemort's wand been destroyed too?
This seems so likely, i think everyone would assume that Voldemorts wand would have been destroyed....But, could he have been smart enough to take his wand with him during his turmiol and near death experience?>?..he seems smart enough to take it with him, but would he have the strength?>?...If you hadn't taken his wand i assume he could have had one of his death eaters fetch him another one...in the second book Ron broke his wand and his mom ended up sending him another one...so i am assuming that either there is more than one of each type of wand, or that (how unlikely this seems) more than one wand is suitable for any particular witch/wizard. We all know that using some one elses wand doesnt preform satisfactory and he had to be able to able to use it perfactly to kill Harry as he had planned...he wouldn't want a malfunctioning wand, know would he?>? So, his wand would have to be same type that he had used the whole time before...
This poses another question for me.... Since Harry and Voldemort have tailfeathers from Faux that no one else has could this mean that he could use Harry's wand with ease and have it work as easily and perfectly as his own, and visa-versa?>?
-Sneakypadfoot :shrug:
scarletfever7 July 13th, 2005, 6:07 am I am not sure who had Voldemorts wand, but I dont think it was Peter or Barty Jr. I just cant see Peter going to find Voldemort's wand with out being told to do it. As for Barty Jr. the time line just doesn't fit. Voldemort had his wand to kill both Frank Bryce and Bertha and that was before Voldemort went to Barty Jr's house to free him from Barty Sr. Maybe Voldemort had his wand, he was just unable to us it because of the form he was in " Mere shadow and vapor ". Maybe the wand bacame a part of him until he was able to return to his own form.
rockonhp July 13th, 2005, 6:10 am Maybe the wand bacame a part of him until he was able to return to his own form.
I think that might be a possibility I mean It doesn't make sense how he just magicaly got his wand
countrylac July 13th, 2005, 6:23 am Jo said that Wormtail gave Voldie back his wand. As far as the spell echos, I think it only does the reversal of the same spell so only the killing curse victims would come out of the wand. That's only my theory.
hwyla July 13th, 2005, 11:48 am Jo said that Wormtail gave Voldie back his wand.Yes, according to a fan who spoke to her personally, (not at an official interview) during the Edinburgh Book Festival 2004, Peter took the wand and hid it. However, this wasn't an official interview and the only witnesses were the two fans.
So, while I for one agree that it's the simplest solution and makes the most sense, the answer isn't considered canon until she admits it elsewere (an official interview or on her website.
aggiefan1206 July 13th, 2005, 6:33 pm He must have found some way to keep it is the only thing i can think of. It seemed wormtail had it in parts of GoF. But then again Voldemort did kill Frank Bryce with AK or it seemed like it ne ways. So mabe he was able to hold his wand in some one.
Shadow Phoenix July 13th, 2005, 6:58 pm I think Dumbledore had a hand in it.
Fry_17 July 13th, 2005, 9:22 pm A lot of people think that Wormtail had it........i have to agree.......i think Wormtail was there the night Voldemort killed Lily and James,probably waiting outside the house......he must of went inside and known what had happened(Voldemort vanished) and took the wand(thinking it special or something as it was Voldemorts,hid it) and fled. Before he returned to Voldemort, he took the wand from its hidden place and given the wand later to Voldemort,in Albania.
MioneBookworm July 13th, 2005, 10:59 pm Originally posted by EvilMeghan:
Good thread, Spitf1re! I think wands are sort of powerful and don't get destroyed that easily (but they can break - like Ron's). Maybe Wormtail got it back for him?
Maybe. Also, maybe some of the DE that were in LV's golden circle, like Lucius, got it back the same way Lucius got Riddle's diary. But Wormtail's theory is very likable too.
invisinudnik July 14th, 2005, 4:54 am A lot of people think that Wormtail had it........i have to agree.......i think Wormtail was there the night Voldemort killed Lily and James,probably waiting outside the house......he must of went inside and known what had happened(Voldemort vanished) and took the wand(thinking it special or something as it was Voldemorts,hid it) and fled. Before he returned to Voldemort, he took the wand from its hidden place and given the wand later to Voldemort,in Albania.
The only problem with that is where would wormtail hide a wand for 13 years? Wouldn't something happen to it or someone discover it in that time? Also, can the wood in wands be damaged with overexposure to the elements or heat/cold/water when exposed for a good amount of time? That hiding place would have to be very protected and very hidden for this to work and i can't think of a place that would work.
vivekgk July 24th, 2005, 10:39 pm The wand does choose the wizard. While you can perform spells with another, you would need your own wand to perform them effectively. Jo has clarified this on many occasions.
I remember reading on some interview that Wormtail retrieved LV's wand. It is possible that he was at Godric's Hollow when the Potters were killed. After all, he was the secret keeper, maybe he needed to show it to Voldemort personally.
He could have seen LV's attempt to murder Harry fail. He could easily have got hold of Voldemort's robe and wand from the rubble, and escaped. He planned it out, hid the robe and wand, and confronted Sirius.
The priori incantem proved that LV's wand was used to commit the murders of Cedric, Frank, Bertha, James and Lily.
GoF Quote:Frank was screaming so loudly that he never heard the words the thing in the chair spoke as it raised a wand.
Evidently, LV had his wand now.
But GoF is inconsistent in many other ways as well. The description of the Avada Kedavra changes in Priori Incantem, from 'a flash of light and a silent rush of air' to 'a green jet of light', the description used in the following books. Jo has acknowledged some of the mistakes, and mentioned that GoF had taken her off-plan.
Her latest revelation, that there might have been somebody with Voldemort at Godric's Hollow, is highly significant.
DrLazy_89 July 24th, 2005, 10:44 pm A lot of people think that Wormtail had it........i have to agree.......i think Wormtail was there the night Voldemort killed Lily and James,probably waiting outside the house......he must of went inside and known what had happened(Voldemort vanished) and took the wand(thinking it special or something as it was Voldemorts,hid it) and fled. Before he returned to Voldemort, he took the wand from its hidden place and given the wand later to Voldemort,in Albania.
But were did he hide it, I mean he was with he Weasleys for all that time.
vivekgk July 24th, 2005, 11:06 pm So what if Wormtail was with the Weasleys? We dont know what he did after he left Godric's Hollow and confronted Sirius in a crowd. Seems he could have hidden it anywhere. Exactly where, we can only speculate.
hwyla July 25th, 2005, 1:51 am Her latest revelation, that there might have been somebody with Voldemort at Godric's Hollow, is highly significant.Oooo! I missed this where/when did she say this - interview or website? Please tell, I want to read it! Thanks!
iLoveLondon July 25th, 2005, 2:19 am wow thats a good point.sum1 shud have asked that to JKR in the interview lol!! i wanna kno the answer........
eagle113 July 25th, 2005, 2:21 am Wormtail had it hidden in the Shreaking Shack
hodhod_baz August 14th, 2005, 12:55 am i didnt realise that....maybe Jo will put it up on her site...
MetallicA August 14th, 2005, 2:16 am I believe that when Voldemort's body was destroyed, so was his wand. When he brought his body back, everything that was in his robes, i.e. his wand, came back. Just a thought
I have the same thoughts.
hafbldprinces August 14th, 2005, 4:36 am maybe he just got a new wand after he got his body back, maybe there was someone with him wen he went to kill the potters and they picked it up thinking voldermort was dead
smartypants August 14th, 2005, 7:21 pm The only problem with that is where would wormtail hide a wand for 13 years? Wouldn't something happen to it or someone discover it in that time? Also, can the wood in wands be damaged with overexposure to the elements or heat/cold/water when exposed for a good amount of time? That hiding place would have to be very protected and very hidden for this to work and i can't think of a place that would work.
I can think of several. The obvious one being a spoiler... ;)
Pikachu010 August 14th, 2005, 7:31 pm I think it happened like this:
LV kills Potters.
LV attack HP, but instead, LV is destroyed, house ruined.
Peter finds LV's wand.
Sirus catches PP on a street.
PP blows up street, cuts of finger, transforms, and goes off to hide LV's wand.
Years later...
Sirus and Lupin expose PP.
PP runs away to find the wand and try to bring LV back to life.
LV kills Frank with someoen else's body, but his wand.
PP brings LV back to life.
LV now has his wand.
Mishlo August 16th, 2005, 2:04 am Yeha... now that the question is being laid down.. I ask that myself... there must have been something EXTREMELY LOYAL and (not in Azkaban) that would get hold of his wand.... AND without the ambition of keeping the wand for himself....
xyrax August 16th, 2005, 3:33 am I think it happened like this:
LV kills Potters.
LV attack HP, but instead, LV is destroyed, house ruined.
Peter finds LV's wand.
Sirus catches PP on a street.
PP blows up street, cuts of finger, transforms, and goes off to hide LV's wand.
Years later...
Sirus and Lupin expose PP.
PP runs away to find the wand and try to bring LV back to life.
LV kills Frank with someoen else's body, but his wand.
PP brings LV back to life.
LV now has his wand.Pretty much that's what I think, too.
mdb09 August 18th, 2005, 5:18 pm I doubt Pettigrew carried the wand as an rat. But maybe when you transform, the wand you're carrying somehow stays with you. Like when we see McGonagall transfrom in Book One, would she really go to Surrey without a wand? I doubt it. And she's wearing glasses and clothes, so those must go somewhere too. So I guess an Animagus could carry a wand, which destroys my previous exclusion of Pettigrew.
drexxell August 24th, 2005, 2:49 pm They are no doubt aware of his continuing existence but not of his location or his state.
If this is true, then how is it that Dumbledore says "my sources indicate he is hiding out in the forests of Albania"? Who are his sources?
Shughla August 24th, 2005, 2:57 pm Maybe he has spies? Or he uses really powerful magic to trace him? Or keeps an eye out for odd inidents, and puts two and two together?
Anyanka August 25th, 2005, 7:47 pm See, this is what convinced me that there had to be someone else there besides Voldemort. Maybe Snape was there... or Lucius or Bellatrix. But then... the wand was returned to him before the death eaters returned...
Freaky August 25th, 2005, 8:18 pm I think Peter Pettigrew had it. I'm sure that he was at the house that night (along with one other) and when things went wrong, he either hid the wand or took it for himself.
Or else, it was blown up into a tree, one of the DE's, like Bellatrix, came along later, searched the area, found it in the tree, stored it somehow, somehow let someone else know...or else Voldermort instructed PP where to find it when they reunited.
Anyone else seeing how unsure I am!!!?
Actually, if Barty Crouch found it on the day V died, hid it somewhere, and then when he tracked V down, he would have passed it on then. We know he didn't have a wand at the World Cup, but he was still a bit under the Imperius Curse then, he could have located it later when V came to his house.
magicphoenix August 26th, 2005, 5:10 am 2 words... Accio Wand!
Peevsie03 August 26th, 2005, 5:29 am Rowling has hinted before that Voldemort was not alone when he attacked the Potters. I don't think that Pettigrew was smart enough to hide voldemort's wand all those years, but I don't know who else would have been able to give it back to voldemort in the beginning of GoF.
_Viktor_Krum_ August 27th, 2005, 6:15 am I don't know how he got his wand back. Maybe he had Peter or another DE to go get it for him... someone with an invisibility cloak, or someone disillusioned......I really don't know.
MionesRevenge August 28th, 2005, 8:59 pm My best guess is Peter. Maybe Peter took his wand and hid it in a temporary hiding spot for safekeeping, and returned for it when he had found a better place. Quite possibly, he gave it to another death eater and asked them to hide it in a safe spot. Everything was a bit chaotic around then, and I think the ministry was more concerned with "Voldemort's gone, get the Death Eaters" instead of "Hey, let's find Voldemort's wand!" People might've thought it had been destroyed, which would give the Death Eaters time to find a safe place for it.
xxtatortotxx August 28th, 2005, 9:02 pm the dudes an evil maniac...you shouldn't question his abilities to do stuff....espicially to just get a wand....the gye is wack!!
chunkylvr678 August 30th, 2005, 11:55 pm Good thread, Spitf1re! I think wands are sort of powerful and don't get destroyed that easily (but they can break - like Ron's). Maybe Wormtail got it back for him?\
I agree, this is a very good thread. Maybe, Vodemort got another wand, or maybe he made one himself. Who knows...
Red_Magic August 31st, 2005, 12:10 am Very good thread, hard to say how he get his wand back I would say probably Wormtail got it for him or perhaps another DE that was with him waiting outside the Potter house, a DE we don't know about yet or perhaps one we do I am sure that exactly what happened at Godric's Hollow that night will been told to us by the end of the series
Freaky September 1st, 2005, 8:12 pm \
I agree, this is a very good thread. Maybe, Vodemort got another wand, or maybe he made one himself. Who knows...
Voldemort couldn't have got a new wand or made himself a new one, we saw this with Priori Incantatum. He may well have new one now, but he didn't at first.
I suddenly wondered whether Barty Crouch (Jnr) managed to hide the wand. He was the second DE to get back to V, and wasn't caught straight away either. He quite possibly was at his father's house after V's defeat, got caught ... but then he returned back to his father's house when he "escaped". V then came to his house with Peter Pettigrew.
I know V killed Frank Bryce at the very beginning of the book though, which might be where I fall short on this theory. Although, could the meeting with Barty have taken place before this death? I can't remember the sequence, or if we even know what happened.
We know the death happened before the World Cup for definite. V talks about his "faithful servant will have returned" but this is implied for after the World Cup, but they have dealt with Bertha Jorkins before this conversation.
Anyone agree this is possible?
Xayla September 1st, 2005, 9:24 pm I think it was Wormtail who got the wand from the ruins of the Potter house & hid it before he did his rat act. The he retrieved it after he was done with his rat act and gave it to LV when he tracked him down.
Harry_Hottie September 3rd, 2005, 2:36 am one of his DE's could have saved it for him, he could have stolen another one, he could have someone else steal one....there are losts of possiblities.
HeRmIoNe_14 December 23rd, 2005, 7:26 pm I guess he kept it. He was still able to make some magic, he killed Frank Bryce in GOF, I think he still had the wand, weak as he was
bravesfan150 December 23rd, 2005, 7:49 pm i think that wormtail was with voldemort, and right when the curse backfired, peter grabbed the wand and put it in his pocket, then transformed into a rat. i think the clothes of an animagus just sort of change into their skin when he became a rat so the wand could have been in his pocket all along
padfootandme December 24th, 2005, 1:17 am i think that wormtail was with voldemort, and right when the curse backfired, peter grabbed the wand and put it in his pocket, then transformed into a rat. i think the clothes of an animagus just sort of change into their skin when he became a rat so the wand could have been in his pocket all along
I agree with the clothes thing too. However, the PoA movie shows Wormtail changing and leaving his clothes behind. Wouldn't that mean that he would change back with no clothes?! I don't know about you, but seeing a naked Wormtail is not high on my list of priorities! :no: :lol:
Murzim December 24th, 2005, 1:28 am I think Vapomort took it with him. Ther is no statemant in the books that ruels out that he could move things. And it must have been in Albania because it was used to kill Bertha Jorkins.
About the clothes I can't believe Sirius had to steal new cloths every time he turned into a man during his flight. As the animals furs seem to look like their clothes I think they turn to fur.
xyrax December 24th, 2005, 2:21 am I think Vapomort took it with him. Ther is no statemant in the books that ruels out that he could move things. And it must have been in Albania because it was used to kill Bertha Jorkins.
About the clothes I can't believe Sirius had to steal new cloths every time he turned into a man during his flight. As the animals furs seem to look like their clothes I think they turn to fur.Wormtail was also in Albania... :eyebrows:
The movie was a mistake. It makes absolutely no sense for an animagi clothes to be left behind every time he or she transforms.
If Voldemort took his wand with him he would have to be able to move objects without a corporeal form, and without a wand. While we see that at the height of his powers he may have been capable of this, I find it unlikely when he's less than human and barely alive. I don't think he was strong enough.
Brooklyn December 24th, 2005, 2:58 am good question never really thoguht about it ..maybe he put some sort of course on it so only person who was touching it to bring it back to him could touch i wouldnt be surprised hes such a powerful wizard
ekat242 December 24th, 2005, 4:06 am I agree with the clothes thing too. However, the PoA movie shows Wormtail changing and leaving his clothes behind. Wouldn't that mean that he would change back with no clothes?! I don't know about you, but seeing a naked Wormtail is not high on my list of priorities! :no: :lol:
Near the end of the PoA movie sirus changes peter back in to a human and he is fully clothed ( that happens to sirus too when he is so badly hurt as a dog he turns back to a human) . Like you said (padfootandme) all of peter's clothes fall off when he turns back into a rat. It doesn't seem to make much sense.
I agree with the thing about the clothes changing with the person a it turns into a animal. That way peter could have been hiding the wand all along, But in PoA peter is trying to get harry's wand and if he had a wand all along that wound't make sense.
Maybe Peter was there when Voldemort lost his power's, and peter took all to voldemorts things. He could have stored them in the riddles house somewhere, he would have known that no one would look there.
schizopath December 24th, 2005, 11:32 am Well, if his body WAS destroyed, how would he reach Quirell? I'm guessing that he held onto his wand when fleeing then saw Quirell. He left his wand at some place and told Wormtail to get it for him in GoF
Murzim December 25th, 2005, 11:56 pm Wormtail was also in Albania...
Yes so either Vapomort or Wormtail had it
My mail was a response to this (next time I'll put in the quote :blush:):
one of his DE's could have saved it for him, he could have stolen another one, he could have someone else steal one....there are losts of possiblities. What I ment to say was that there aren’t ‘lots of possibilities’ and that I think it most likely Vapomort took it with him.
I was too lazy to mention the rat, as I think it’s obvious to everybody who’s had a look at this thread that he could have brought it there :p:
Well, if his body WAS destroyed, how would he reach Quirell? I'm guessing that he held onto his wand when fleeing then saw Quirell. He left his wand at some place and told Wormtail to get it for him in GoF His body definitely WAS destroyed and he did not ‘reach Quirrel’, Quirrel walked into the forest where Voldemort had been hiding for years and the remains of Voldemort’s soul took him over. If Voldemort could move his wand to a hiding place, then why not take it with him?
But in PoA peter is trying to get harry's wand and if he had a wand all along that wound't make sense. :no: He didn't in the book, or did I miss something?
Maybe Peter was there when Voldemort lost his power's, and peter took all to voldemorts things. He could have stored them in the riddles house somewhere, he would have known that no one would look there. Well, I don't think he knew about Voldemort being a Riddle or about the Riddle house and that house was inhabited by Muggles. But as a rat he could have hidden it in all sorts of places where neither wizard nor muggle would ever find it.
bravesfan150 December 26th, 2005, 12:32 am I agree with the clothes thing too. However, the PoA movie shows Wormtail changing and leaving his clothes behind. Wouldn't that mean that he would change back with no clothes?! I don't know about you, but seeing a naked Wormtail is not high on my list of priorities! :no: :lol:
i bolded and underlined the key words in your post. see if you can figure it out for yourself
in OotP sirius transforms into a dog right beside harry, and it doesnt say that his clothes lay in a pile where he transformed
lunarsphere December 26th, 2005, 1:06 am He would have been able to move it by psychokinesis, but his powers would have been minimal whilst he was disembodied.
schizopath December 26th, 2005, 3:57 am :huh: Voldemort does not have psychokinesis
Hardyhardnut December 26th, 2005, 4:43 pm :huh: Voldemort does not have psychokinesis
Agreed.:lol:
lunarsphere December 27th, 2005, 12:26 am Do you know the precise extent of Voldemort's powers? A wizard would have great affinity for his wand anyway, it wouldn't be like moving an ordinary object.
Hardyhardnut December 27th, 2005, 2:53 pm Do you know the precise extent of Voldemort's powers? A wizard would have great affinity for his wand anyway, it wouldn't be like moving an ordinary object.
That is a good point. I was thinking about this last night, and I no longer think it impossible.
In OotP, Harry manages to make the tip of his wand light up by muttering the appropriate charm, Lumos, even though he is not in direct contact with the wand.
Therefore, would it not be feasible for Voldemort to do the same thing with an Accio charm?
schizopath December 27th, 2005, 3:42 pm Perhaps Voldy said "Accio Wand" and the wand came zooming at him. Or Quirell or Wormtail said "Accio Dark Lord's Wand"...
Hardyhardnut December 27th, 2005, 6:03 pm Perhaps Voldy said "Accio Wand" and the wand came zooming at him. Or Quirell or Wormtail said "Accio Dark Lord's Wand"...
Hehe. It's a possibility...
olin January 23rd, 2006, 9:08 pm This is a good question. I think a related question is, was the wand gone before Hagrid came to get little Harry? If it wasn't, why didn't Hagrid take the wand (unless it was hidden??)? If it was, why didn't the person there, if a Deatheater, kill/etc. Harry (unless they were too afraid, or cowardly)?
effinheartu January 24th, 2006, 12:20 am Well Voldy-poo might have captured Ollivander, remember? So he probly got Olli to make him a new wand. It probably didn't have the Phoenix feather but I'm sure old Olli could have made another wand for Voldy.
runnersgw January 24th, 2006, 5:55 am The scenario you present isn't possible effinheartu. LV lost his wand when he tried to kill Harry and was turned into Vapormort. We KNOW that the wand he had then is the same wand he has in the last few books. Priori Incantum showed Lilly and James' "ghost" (I know they aren't ghosts, but I don't have a better word.) If Ollivander had made him a new wand, two things would have happened: 1) Priori Incantum wouldn't have happened, remember it's only when a wand fights it's brother, so unless Ollivander got another feather from Fawkes, that isn't possible. 2) Even if it did happen, Lilly and James would not have shown up during the effect.
As to how LV got his wand back, I thing someone was there with him at the Potter's house that night. My money would be on Wormtail, considering he was the Secret Keeper. After the spell rebounded, he might have grabbed Voldy's wand and got out of there. I don't think Vapormort could have taken it with him. It could also have been picked up sometime in the future. The wand might have been buried in the rubble or whatever and Wormtail or Quirrel or somebody might have gone to get it.
TeraBlight March 11th, 2006, 10:13 am Okay, I read the entire thread, and made notes (go me! ;)).
These are the remarks/questions I have:
It has been suggested that Wormtail used the Dark Wand for the mass muggle killing at the site at which Sirius was arrested, because his own wand wouldn't be powerful enough. That is nonsense (no offense), no wand is powerful in and of itself, and there is every reason to believe that Wormtail will do best with his own wand.
It has been suggested that Wormtail, since we know that his old wand was sent to his mother, does not have a wand of his own during "Goblet". Looking at the Priori Incantatem, this would however mean that he didn't perform a single bit of magic during that year, since these would have shown up somehow between the echoes of Cedric and Frank Bryce. The only indication given are "screams of pain from the wand", which represent the Crucio Voldemort performed on Wormtail after he let Crouch Sr escape.
Anyway, this is not a problem, there is no reason why Wormtail shouldn't have kept Bertha's wand.
Wormtail's escape:
It was Hermione's scream that alerted him --
Pettigrew had dived for Lupin's dropped wand. Ron, unsteady on his
bandaged leg, fell. There was a bang, a burst of light -- and Ron lay
motionless on the ground. Another bang -- Crookshanks flew into the air
and back to the earth in a heap.
"Expelliarmus." Harry yelled, pointing his own wand at Pettigrew;
Lupin's wand flew high into the air and out of sight. "Stay where you
are!" Harry shouted, running forward.
Too late. Pettigrew had transformed. Harry saw his bald tail whip
through the manacle on Ron's outstretched arm and heard a scurrying
through the grass.
If he had carried the Dark Wand at this time, would the Expelliarmus have acted on it as well? Or does it only get rid of wands that the target holds in his hand? Do we have canon evidence either way?
From Voldemort's speech:
"I was as powerless as the weakest creature alive, and without the means to help myself...
for I had no body, and every spell that might have helped me required the use of a
wand...
[...]
I sometimes inhabited animals - snakes, of course, being my preference - but I was
little better off inside them than as pure spirit, for their bodies were ill adapted to
perform magic"
What are we to make of this? The first part certainly sounds like he couldn't hold or carry a wand, while the second part almost suggests that he had access to a wand but due to the snakes' handless bodies couldn't hold it? But if he couldn't carry one to Albania, how could he possibly have access to one before Wormtail arrived? Alternatively, he might be suggesting that snakes are ill adapted for wandless magic. Since we know hardly anything about this, I'm going to refrain from speculating any more.
Right, that's all I picked up for now. I'll have to see whether it congeals into anything resembling a theory :)
|