| Login | Floo Network |
| Notices |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Discussion for The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater by Emma C.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
That is a very good theory. I never even noticed that the Rufus said a different curse and I forgot that Moody wasn't there. It's definitely something to keep in mind until Book 7.
Great job! Very Original. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
WOW! a fab theory and i think you may have a point.....ever since dumbledores death i was in denial and concluded that his death was staged....your theory backs this up.
it would certainly explain alot....if he wanted to, dumbledore, the most powerful wizard, would surely have been able to save himself from the situation he was in up the tower. his main priority was to protext harry and i think he definatly has spys for voldemort. the absence of moody was also unexplainable but your idea gives him a location. your theory also shows, as i have long suspected, that snape is good....he would have known and been involved about plans for dumbledores death. this is why he didn't hesitate to make the unbreakable vow, as the idea was that dumbledore should die (for some reason unbeknown to us) as part of dumbledores plan. also, read back over the part when snape makes the vow and it appears he is bloking his mind from bellatrix who is trying to do occlumency. (his expression was "unreadable") this shows snape was trying to hide something. i think dumbledore planned his death (with snapes help) as part of a plan against voldemort. it would make sense and your editorial shows this. there are tonnes of hidden clues in the books but you've picked up on this one and reakon you're right!! ![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
I think that it is an interesting theory and I will have to re read that chapter carefully when I get to it, and see how the spells get mixed up. It very well might be that Moody is in disguise, and would then help Harry to understand the reason behind what happened on the tower, and have him and Snape working together again, but with JK you never know.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
i think this is a great theory. but in the editorial it said it could have been that scrimgeour may have got the spells mixed up. i think this is unlikley . if the BFDE isnt moody, then i think that scrimgeour just thought harry would slip up and correct him on the wrong spell and by doing that, admit he was on the tower.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
I enjoyed your editorial, though I'm not quite convinced yet. Why Moody wasn't present certainly needs an explanation, and yours might work. But I must say I really think Dumbledore is dead, and in that case, it seems to be a very difficult task for Moody to be present just to make sure Snape kills Dumbledore, not Draco. If Dumbledore is still alive, though, I think your theory may be right.
Anyway, nice job!
__________________
'The consequences of our actions are always so complicated, so diverse, that predicting the future is a very difficult business indeed ...' -Dumbledore, PoA p 311, Br. paperback. Never tickle a sleeping Moody. -well, it's no good crying over spilt potion, I suppose ... but the cat's among the pixies now. -we might as well be hanged for a dragon as an egg. (Mrs. Figg is fantastic! )
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Excellent theory! I did notice that death eater and thought it peculiar but didn't apply your logic. Thanks for the idea!
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
It is interesting, and a really well thought out theory. However, could it be a mistake by JKR? Or can stupefied be used in more general terms in some cases if the effect is similar? Maybe. How could he(Scrimgeour) have rephrased it using the actual spell that was used on BFDE? It's plausible, but I'm not leaning toward believing it, because my belief is strongly against Snape being good, and I still think more evidence points in that direction. You did a great job though!
__________________
Sneaky Nasty And Pure Evil ![]() I TRUST HARRY POTTER
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Ok, I've got to give this one an unequivocal No. The problem with this theory is that it is based on the theory that Dumbledore ordered Snape to kill him. I reject that theory totally. Killing is, as Shughorn tells us, the supreme act of evil. Dumbledore has dedicated his life to opposing evil and for him to order anyone's killing, even his own, is a total violation of who he is.
Secondly, the theory relies on a single very weak thread, being the misidentification of the spell used. This could be a slip by Rowling, or careless language by Scrimgouer, or, as sugested above, an attempt to trap Harry into admitting he was on the tower that night. I'm sorry, but this is simply not enough to hold the theory together. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Quote:
__________________
"'I don't mean to be rude -' he began, in a tone that threatened rudeness in every syllable. '- yet, sadly, accidental rudeness occurs alarmingly often,' Dumbledore finished the sentence gravely." (HBP, "Will and Won't", pg. 46 American Harcover Edition) |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Interesting idea. Kinda pushing it so far as it being Moody though. Keep up the good work...
OMT |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Hmm...could be. Nice theory, something to think about.
__________________
It's Dragostea Din Tei, not the Numa Numa Song! IB: The Few, the Proud, the Sleep-Deprived. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Polyjuice potion has to be administered hourly. It would have worn of soon after the MoM guys got to the stunned Moody if this were true, or perhaps even before. Thus, Scrimgeour would have known by the time that he spoke to Harry that it was not a Death Eater, but Moody.
I think that we can just attribute this to JKR not completely editting her own work, or perhaps even
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
I agree with Wimsey about Polyjuice--plus Moody would have had to get part of whichever DE he was impersonating.
I like Kicker's idea that Scrimgeour was trying to trap Harry.
__________________
WHY DUMBLEDORE TRUSTED SNAPE: PoA 204-5, 285, 361; GoF 588, 590-91; 709-10; OotP 363, 841-3; HBP 549 (American hardbacks). It's not because he said he was remorseful, it's what he did about it. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Nice catch about the mixed up spells. I have to agree with Wimsey, though. I think it was either a mistake on the Minister's part or on JKR's.
Just because it doesn't say that he escapes or was captured, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Unless I missed something, I don't remember Greyback leaving the caste either.
__________________
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
I think everyone's been missing something important here: the DEs set up a barrier that Harry assumed, and I think he was right, only allowed people who have been branded with the dark mark to pass. Even if Moody did use the polyjuice potion, as he has never been branded with the dark mark by Voldemort I don't think it would've let him pass. I think it was just a mistake made by Rowling, but it's nice to see people pay attention to details.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
The most probable theory is that JKR/Scrimgeour said "stupified" in a general way. The most interesting part of this theory is, "where exactly was Moody?" I'd like to hear more theories on that subject. Good editorial and good attention to detail!
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
Quote:
This editorial took a lot of careful thought. I don't see too many innovative ideas, things that others didn't notice before, but this editorial found one. I agree with Jacob_Marley that this editorial depends on the theory that Dumbledore asked Snape to kill him. And I just don't think Dumbledore would do that. And I agree with Wimsey that this is just a JK slipup or an editorial goof. But good job thinking of a new angle. Last edited by SusanBones; July 19th, 2006 at 2:15 am. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
I don't buy the idea that there was a member of the order of the Phoenix there to make sure that Snape killed Dumbledore. What's next? Is some Snape lover going to suggest that Tonks helped Malfoy get his cabinet to work in order to set up the Snape kills Dumbledore scene because Dumbledore wanted to be murdered by snape in front of Harry?
How about this: Scrimgeour was an Auror and the head of Magical Law Enforcement. He's probably about as paranoid as Moody but maybe just a bit smarter. Afterall he did make it to the top. Scrimgeour was fishing for information. He deliberately misnamed the spell that was used on the Death Eater on the tower in hopes of eliciting a response from Harry. If Harry had said, "I don't know who Petrified that Death Eater." Scrimgeour would have him. It's just a standard interrogation trick. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Mystery of the Stupefied Death Eater
You guys believe everything
This theorie is complete **** And about where Moody was: Dumbledore just called some Order members to patrol the corridors while he was gone. Not the whole order will be there, just a couple of people. Moody just wasn't part of it. Last edited by YaMo; July 18th, 2006 at 10:12 pm. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Original content is Copyright © MMII - MMVIII, CoSForums.com. All Rights Reserved. Other content (posts, images, etc) is Copyright © its respective owners. |
|