| Login | Floo Network |
| Notices |
|
#961
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
So I found myself a little surprised that I ended up liking this episode more than the 2nd one.
Spoiler: show
__________________
![]() Gryffindor on Pottermore & CoS. Wand: 12 1/2 in, Apple, Dragon, Pliant |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#962
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Spoiler: show
__________________
SOUTHEND UNITED 1
VS CHELSEA FC 1 FA CUP ROUND 3 - JANUARY 1ST 2009 WE'RE THE GREATEST EVER TEAM THE WORLD'S EVER SEEN - SOUTHEND UNITED FC My blog: http://thewritersodyssey.weebly.com/ |
|
#963
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
I enjoyed this episode more than last week's as well.
Spoiler: show ETA: Ten Teasers for next week's 'The Power of Three' Spoiler: show ETA2: Spoiler: show
__________________
Last edited by Lord Godric; September 16th, 2012 at 5:13 pm. |
|
#964
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Well, I thought that was the weakest episode in a while. The plot-line seemed a bit herky-jerk, and although I appreciated the story that they were trying to tell, well, it just was not well-executed.
I was wondering if we'd meet another Oswald or something, but unless I missed her/him, it seems that we didn't. Next week's story looks like it might get back to some arcs. Let's hope so!
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
|
#965
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
The first 5 episodes story arc is all about the Pond's exit and setting up Jenna's character's return in the christmas special.
More teasers - Spoiler: show Jemma Redgrave possible big spoiler about her character - Spoiler: show
__________________
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. I'm lme. Really lme.
or so says Moriath |
|
#966
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
Spoiler: show And if there is a relationship to that older character, then I'm betting that it will be granddaughter, not daughter! But as for the Ponds leaving, yes, that will be happening: but to call it an arc is to greatly exaggerate how prominent it has been in the narratives so far. Next week promises to be a bit different, obviously: the commercials make it pretty plain that it's an actual issue for the characters, not just the show.
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
|
#967
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
This isn't the first time the Doctor had to make the decision whether or not he was going to send an alien back to their home world knowing that death or some other unpleasant punishment awaited them. He was planning to send the Slitheen back to her home planet in Boomtown. She kept trying to play on his sympathies to get him to relent. Finally, the Tardis reduced her to an egg so she could start her life over.
__________________
![]() avatar artwork by Ruth Sanderson |
|
#968
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Found this on Hypable from the writer of next week's episode.
Spoiler: show Regarding Jemma Redgrave Spoiler: show
__________________
|
|
#969
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
Spoiler: show Moffat has something up his sleeve for Clara/Oswin. Quote:
Spoiler: show It's a small story arc in the first 5 episodes, the Ponds deciding to leave the Doctor behind and lead a normal life Spoiler: show All the Christmas hints ? Probably leading to how Jenna's character pops into the Doctor's life. Oh and there might be a small teaser of the Christmas special at the end of episode 5.
__________________
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. I'm lme. Really lme.
or so says Moriath |
|
#970
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Now, this would be frickin' cool! It seems like Mr. Smith intends to stick around for at least one more year after this. I had been thinking that perhaps he'd phase out on the 50th anniversary show.
Quote:
I was hoping so, but I'm becoming less certain. I was expecting something like Bad Wolf or Saxon: i.e., something that kept appearing in different episodes leading to the climax. In particular, I suspected that it would be something involving an infamous individual who shares their surnames and who made his mark at the same time that Doctor Who debuted! Now, I'm not too sure. Instead, I'm thinking that it might just turn out to be a cosmic coincidence that they never really address.
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
|
#971
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Well, tonight's episode was marginally better, but it jumped around from being good to just awful. This series just hasn't grabbed me like the last one. Is it just me, or are they trying to be too clever?
|
|
#972
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
I really liked tonight's episode. I can't believe that next week is the fall season finale. I am so scared about what might happen to Rory and Amy.
![]()
__________________
![]() avatar artwork by Ruth Sanderson |
|
#973
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
I really don't want anything bad to happen to them, but it almost seems like something bad has to happen to them for them to just stop traveling with the Doctor. Great new episode. Spoiler: show I am excited to see River again!
__________________
![]() Gryffindor on Pottermore & CoS. Wand: 12 1/2 in, Apple, Dragon, Pliant |
|
#974
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
Would fans really forgive an Adric-like ending for the Ponds? Would Moffat really be so cheesy as to give them a horrific end after having Brian explicitly express his fears of that sort of outcome? I am a bit bummed that their send-off involves the weeping angels (super-duper predictable. yawn). And (I know I'm alone in this, but...) I find weeping angels about as frightening as I find cottage cheese. They put me to sleep. But it will be great to see River. ![]() ETA: One thing I really loved about tonight's episode... UNIT and the daughter of the Brigadier. No way Moffat introduces a Lethbridge-Stewart without making her recurring. So... more of UNIT soon, I imagine.
__________________
![]() VIVA LA GLITTELUTION! Pottermore: AsphodelPhoenix | Proud member of the House of Merlin ![]() Hogsmeade Awards: Voted #1 - Most Likely to Be a Hogwarts Professor | Voted #2 - Smartest Member "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." - Number 6
Last edited by ccollinsmith; September 25th, 2012 at 8:24 pm. Reason: Removed spoiler tags |
|
#975
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
__________________
I am incapable of hating someone who, instead of using a spell to guard the Sorcerer's Stone, uses a logic puzzle. I'm sorry. ![]() VIVA LA GLITTELUTION Avatar by SIP
|
|
#976
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
I have been a Dr. Who fan since it came back onto our screen but I cannot for the life of me remember a
Spoiler: show Can some one please point me in the correct direction for this? As for this episode: Spoiler: show
__________________
What were you talking about just then? Nothing! Nothing. Amazing subject that one produces such fasanating results in people When scientists discover the centre of the universe
Don't be suprised if its not you Proud to be a ![]() |
|
#977
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Spoiler: show
__________________
SOUTHEND UNITED 1
VS CHELSEA FC 1 FA CUP ROUND 3 - JANUARY 1ST 2009 WE'RE THE GREATEST EVER TEAM THE WORLD'S EVER SEEN - SOUTHEND UNITED FC My blog: http://thewritersodyssey.weebly.com/ |
|
#978
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
Spoiler: show I have to say I love the little referances to the classic series that crop up, generally I think they're well done, enough to make oldies squee but not (normally) leaving those new to Dr Who feeling like they missed somethng important. As for this series I feel a little hohum about it - its not terrible but its not gripping me either but I have to agree with Iggi Spoiler: show
__________________
![]() My Fanfic - The Silver Thread - (WIP) updated 03/07/09 Sig by the most professional, clever & witty Boushh (Original photo-manipulation of AR by helin) |
|
#979
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
Classic Who character. More specifically, he's a major character during the run of the 3rd Doctor, when the Time Lords took the "keys" to the TARDIS and grounded the Doctor on Earth. During that period, the Doctor worked with UNIT. I find the 3rd Doctor episodes I've seen quite fun. The first episodes of the Master occur during the 3rd Doctor's run. (There is a character called the Master in a 2nd Doctor episode, but he's not a renegade Time Lord, so different character). BTW, the Brigadier was mentioned in last year's finale. The Doctor tries to phone him and learns that he has died.
__________________
![]() VIVA LA GLITTELUTION! Pottermore: AsphodelPhoenix | Proud member of the House of Merlin ![]() Hogsmeade Awards: Voted #1 - Most Likely to Be a Hogwarts Professor | Voted #2 - Smartest Member "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." - Number 6
Last edited by ccollinsmith; September 25th, 2012 at 8:25 pm. Reason: Removed spoiler tags |
|
#980
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new Doctor Who v.5 (spoilers in abundance also for season 7)
Quote:
The Brigadier has been mentioned by Doctor's 9-11: he's usually stuck in Peru, where he's retired. However, it was the Brigadier who the Doctor was trying to call in "The River of Wedding Song" only to learn that his old friend was dead: this was a deliberate tribute to the character and the actor who died in early 2011. (My wife never watched the old series and she didn't get why that scene was supposed to be poignant; I, on the other hand, was almost snuffling!) Here is the brief history of the Brigadier: again, it's assumed that you know this stuff.(Alternatively, you could spend 3 weeks watching all of the old Doctors on Netflix!) 1. Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart was an intelligent capable young officer in the British army who encountered the 2nd Doctor during an attempted invasion of earth using robot Yeti;One episode that fills in a little of the dynamics of this time is the Sarah Jane Adventure "Death of the Doctor." Katy Manning, who played UNIT member Jo Grant (the 3rd Doctor's companion for 3 seasons) returns, and Matt Smith guest stars as the Doctor. It's interesting because, basically, Matt Smith and 60 something Kate Manning are, for all intents and purposes, The Doctor and Jo Grant. There are numerous flashbacks showing the Brigadier, the Master and the first 4 Doctors. (Sarah Jane herself worked with UNIT for a bit, although they were estranged it seems in the end.) As for last night's story..... It was OK. In a lot of ways, it was an extended "prequel" I think, with a bit of foreshadowing of what is to come. It was a sort of "Rosenstern and Guildencrantz are Dead" story in that the plot focused on the "behind the scenes" stuff, and was more to develop Amy and Rory as normal people instead of as Companions. UNIT's return was (as always) welcome, although I wish that they'd been a bit more forceful in their presence. (And where was Bessie?!?!?!) My guess is that this coupled with Angels will make a good 2-parter: I'm betting that there will be a lot of added poignancy to some moments in this tale. However, we've not gotten there yet. Still, I will very much miss the Ponds: they've had companions who should have been couples (Ian & Barbara, Ben & Polly, Jamie & Victoria), but never companions who actually were couples. That created a very different dynamic. I am hoping (and have been for, like, 30 years) that UNIT will become a more common presence in the show. I'm also glad that they "legitimized" Kate Stewart. If I remember, she was originally devised for the book series, which is in sort of a gray area between fan-fiction and canon.
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() Last edited by Wimsey; September 24th, 2012 at 3:45 am. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Original content is Copyright © MMII - MMVIII, CoSForums.com. All Rights Reserved. Other content (posts, images, etc) is Copyright © its respective owners. |
|