| Login | Floo Network |
| Notices |
|
#41
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
However, regardless of the mode, we know that Voldemort could not sneak into Hogwarts. Voldemort would not have resorted to the more complicated scheme of using Malfoy to sneak the Diary into Hogwarts if Voldemort himself could sneak it into the castle, or simply open the Chamber again himself. Also, if Voldemort could have snuck in as a snake, then why did he not assassinate anybody (like, say, Dumbledore) at the school? We have no indication that he did, and people like Dumbledore are quite certain that Hogwarts is safe from Voldemort. This strongly suggests that there were no failed assassination attempts, either! Quote:
Quote:
Moreover, this would not have helped Voldemort later: if he could have gotten into the Chamber in later years, then he would have just gone there himself, released the Basilisk, and hidden the Diary in the Chamber without including Lucius Malfoy. The fact that someone who works alone was forced to use a middle man tells us that Voldemort had given up on getting into the castle himself. Quote:
What Voldemort would have wanted, of course, was a room that Voldemort and only Voldemort could access. That would be a great hiding place for a Horcrux. Can the room provide that? Who knows. However, given that this would effectively end the plot, I am doubting that we'll see this: unless the bit of Voldemort in Harry's scar lets him access the room, too! (But what would possibly get Harry to request it?) Of course, all of this is predicated on Voldemort knowing about the room. As there is no evidence that he did, and as we should assume that people do not know about this room until we get evidence to the contrary, we already are on thin ice! (Surely, Voldemort would have thought of some way to use the room to his advantage earlier, had he known about it!)
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() Last edited by Wimsey; April 25th, 2007 at 5:10 am. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Good point about Tom Riddle and his knowledge or ignorance of this room but if he did know about it maybe you have to request access to it in parseltongue like you did the Chamber. Not many people can speak it and only few understand it. Albus was one who understood it but could he speak it I wonder? Maybe if Harry asked for a room in parseltongue it would be interesting to find out what happened.
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Great Editorial
The room is a good idea it can become anything you need it for. No one could access it , look at Harry trying to get in when Malfoy was using it. I believe Voldemort could come and go from Hogwarts at anytime. He said he searched the school for years. It's probable he know all the secret passageways before he left school . And as for the books in there he was using it like a library, read one book and then put it back. Ha Ha. DD can become invisible I'm sure Voldemort could also. I believe the Chamber of Secrets holds a Horcrux . I posted this after HBP but everone said the chamber was used already. I saw an interview with D Haymen years ago after HPPA he was asked if they where saving the sets he said only the chamber because JK Rowling said it would be used again. I've search for the interview but they only seam to keep the ones from the actors. If anyone remembers this interview please post to let us know. ![]() |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
Too many readers would ask why Voldemort did not ask for a room that opened only for him if Rowling used the Parseltongue route. She would have to explain why Voldemort did not do the obvious thing, but there really is no way that she could explain that the Parseltongue route is possible whereas the personal room one is not. Nobody seems to know too much about exactly how the room works: yes, it cannot do anything, but it can do a lot of things. Harry himself would have to learn the theory, because we read only what Harry witnesses. Quote:
Quote:
(Also, the Chamber itself was not much of a set: that was mostly CGI, I think!) Again, the Diary would have wound up in the Chamber had Voldemort's plan gone properly. Why would Voldemort want two Horcruxes in the same place? Just one lucky Parseltongue, and one third of his Horcruxes could be destroyed at once!
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() Last edited by Wimsey; April 25th, 2007 at 5:29 am. |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Wimsey you said that his uncle is in Azkaban and I read it as Voldemort's uncle. Who is this uncle? I thought Voldemort wa the only one left alive as Morphin (he is the uncle you are referring to isn't he) died didn't he? I may be wrong though and he is still alive.
|
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
The real upshot is that this means that by his sixth year (and well before the time Voldemort was trying to hide Horcruxes), Voldemort was aware that he was not the only parselmouth left, as he had flattered himself in his fifth year. Now, are parselmouths rare? Sure. But does someone like Voldemort want to trust his immortality to improbable when he can trust it to impossible? If the Room opens only for Lord Voldemort, then no unfriendly parselmouth can get his Horcrux. So, given the choice between a room that only Voldemort can access and one that can only be opened by a parselmouth (which includes but might not be limited to Voldemort), Voldemort should choose the former. Otherwise, Rowling has a plot that depends on Voldemort doing something out-of-character in that it is both unintelligent (i.e., an idiot plot) and not paranoid enough, OR one that depends on somehow informing the reader that the Room can do one thing but not another. Of course, either way, Rowling winds up recycling a plot-device from a prior book, which never is a good thing either. (She has recycled plot elements, but always in new ways.) Of course, this really should be an academic argument. Voldemort had only two items that would become Horcruxes when he left Hogwarts. Voldemort did not have access to Hogwarts afterwards, unless Rowling resorts to more out-of-character backstory for Voldemort. So, it necessarily follows that neither the Cup nor the unknown Ravenclaw/Gryffindor relic are in the Room of Requirement.
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() Last edited by Wimsey; April 25th, 2007 at 4:15 pm. |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Maybe it is me but I don't see the chamber of secrets in the book's cover art.
|
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
I've always thought that there was a horcurx hidden in the room of Requirment, or at least that Harry will find some useful items in the piles of banned junk.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Wimsey- It may be that the answer to why Riddle could not get a room that he alone could access is actually very simple. We are speaking of a room in a school. Would the builder of a room in such a place want to create a place of complete privacy? I wouldn't think so. The room where students hide things they dont want found is no doubt known to the staff besides Trelawny, and the accumulated debris no doubt leaves some doubt in the minds of its users about what might be safely hidden there.
Slytherin probably encouraged his student's predjudices. If his students were inclined to kidnap or even kill those they saw as unfit to be at Hogwarts, giving them a place to dispose of the bodies where they would never be found would be too much temptation for some. Of course if a horcrux was in such a room as only Voldemort can enter, that would make Harry's horcrux quest problematic. As for Parseltongue as the key, JKR has already had Slytherin use it as the key to the Chamber of Secrets. I think if it is used again, it will be by Slytherin, perhaps to open the Locket. As you say, since Riddle was quite aware of other Parseltongue speakers, he would be less inclined to use it as a key. |
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
(Along this lines, why would the person who made the room [if that indeed is the room's origin] want anyone to control it with Parseltongue, given that the language is associated with the Dark Arts by most wizards and witches?) Also, would Voldemort be so forgiving of such a room? If he could not get a room that responded only to him (and we have no reason to think that it would not: after all, it provides spaces for students to do forbidden things as it is), then he should have decided to not use the room. Voldemort can find other places that he can secure more effectively than that. Otherwise, Rowling would be writing an idiot plot that would demean and diminish Voldemort's character: he is supposed to be brilliant and paranoid, and leaving a Horcrux in a room where anyone could find it would be far from brilliant or paranoid. Quote:
As for the "problematic" part, that is my key point. Rowling had to write a plot that would not have readers thinking "that was really stupid of Voldemort and/or Dumbldore" while at the same time not leaving them thinking "there is no way Harry could have figure out that." The Room simply does not allow for that. If Voldemort could get into Hogwarts to hide the Cup and/or the unknown Horcrux, then Dumbledore is diminished. If Voldemort is willing to hide a Horcrux in a room that anybody can access, then Voldemort is diminished. If Harry can figure out that it was put in Hogwarts when Dumbledore could not, then Dumbledore is diminished and/or Harry looks impossibly brilliant. All of these are very bad options! If Rowling instead has Voldemort hide the Cup and the unknown Horcrux in two places of personal importance to Voldemort outside of Hogwarts, of which Harry infers by combining what he learns from Dumbledore and R.A.B., then she (probably) will leave far fewer readers thinking that Dumbledore and/or Voldemort acted foolishly, or that Harry got overly lucky. The final thing to consider is the trajectory of the story. Hogwarts' role in the overarching plot is to provide Harry with the basic tools for the final showdown. At some point, the hero has to step out from behind the safety of his mentors and conquer the antagonist alone with the tools that they gave him. Hogwarts might contribute one or two aids: but Harry has to go forth into the larger world for Hogwarts' role in the plot to be truly fulfilled.
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() Last edited by Wimsey; April 26th, 2007 at 5:54 am. |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Wimsey- I think I already agreed with most of what you just said, at least in effect. JKR cannot put a horcrux in a place only Voldemort can access unless there is away around the protection of the site, or around the protection of the horcrux. Both of those, while possible, make her project much harder.
But, since Harry hid the Prince's potion book in the RoR, there is a good chance he will go back there anyway. It might occur to him that the horcrux might be there, and a conversation with Ron and Hermione about it might result. HArry might say it isn't grand enough for Voldemort, but wonder if he might have sought a special room of his own. Hermione might say, "That is easy enough to test," and ask for a room only she could access. If it doesn't work, the possibility is excluded. You are right it is JKR who must lead the story, but somehow she has to make clear that the RoR could not be a hiding place. The question is what is the most concise way to do it compatible with what ever else she wants to do? Finding the Horcruxes would do the job, but if found too easily, the same problems of diminishing Voldemort and DUmbledore apply. And one way to avoid that would be to have the Trio look somewhere it isn't. Doesn't it diminish Harry to not even think of the RoR? I disagree to a point about both the locket and Hogwarts. I would not expect random Parseltongue to open the locket. But none of them were trying to open the locket. Forget the Horcrux aspect for a moment. It might just as well have been Slytherin's Amulet as Slytherin's Locket. But it is a Locket, and Lockets usually contain things of importance to their owner. And Voldemort probably knows what is in this one. If one oughtn't introduce a pistol without eventually firing it, ought one introduce a locket and never open it? Whose picture might be in there, and what/who might she look like? I suspect that there is more to the dispute which broke up the founders than we now know, and it will be relevant to how the school will be more unified in the future. JKR has apparently used the relationships (and adventures) of the contemporary students to suggest what things have been like at Hogwarts for a long time, at least as far back as Harry's parents, and even through Tom RIddle. Why would these parallels not extend back to the early days of the school? They might explain why Slytherin chose to leave when he did, where was Gryfindor's sword before Harry needed it, what special connection Dumbledore has to the school, and perhaps even why Voldemort was apparently williing to spare Lily. I don't imagine that JKR would expect us to extrapolate this far. I expect we will learn something additonal about the Founders in DH. But the Locket is something which could be opened early on. |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
WIMSEY; I should have said when he was a student and when he worked for Borgins & Berks before Dumbledor became head. He could have placed Ravevclaw's cup then. You may be right that I may not be remembering what D. Hayman said correctly I'm familiar with Rowling and Kloves interview. After thinking about this editoral and reading the posts I would hope DD search the Chamber and if not why not. I like to add Voldmort gave the Diary to Lucius Malfoy for safe keeping, not to be used .
|
|
#53
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well, I am sure that it will for some readers, but I know that anything that Rowling does will diminish Harry in the eyes of some readers! (We saw that with the last two books.) That being said, Harry knows that Voldemort had no access to Hogwarts after he (Voldemort) acquired the "final four" Horcruxes. Harry knows the lengths to which Voldemort had to go to sneak the Diary into Hogwarts. Harry could eliminate the Room just on that knowledge. Hmmm: I hope that Rowling does not resort to using Ron to come up with ideas like the RoR replete with some convoluted explanation for how Voldemort might have snuck into the place, and then having Hermione or Harry shoot them down. She does that to poor Ron enough as it is! Quote:
That being written, Rowling could have it include something like a hint about where Slytherin's Tomb is. Voldemort certainly would hallow that place..... However, then I would ask: why didn't Voldemort remove that from the Locket? He would not want one Horcrux providing any evidence about the location of another. In a sense, that would turn 2 Horcruxes into 1.9 Horcruxes: the safety of numbers is lessened slightly. Really, if there was anything important in the Locket, Voldemort should have taken it out for his own purposes. Quote:
That being said, Harry will need some clue that Dumbledore did not have that will lead him there. Hmmmm, perhaps there is something to opening the locket after all! Still, why would Voldemort leave something like that there? That is as bad as Dumbledore not paying attention while Voldemort sneaks around Hogwarts. Quote:
So, given how we have seen Voldemort operate, it would be very much out-of-character for him to do something so hasty and over which he had so very little personal control. He took his time with the Ring and with the Locket. He hoped to one day return to Hogwarts as a teacher, and his prospects for doing so must have seemed good at the time. (Remember, the then-headmaster thought very highly of Voldemort.) So, why do something so desperate? Quote:
Quote:
There is (possibly) an extremely important clue in that exchange. Harry asks why Voldemort was so upset at Malfoy when it was Voldemort's plan all along to send the Diary into Hogwarts. Dumbledore notes that when Voldemort did devised the plan (shortly before Godrics Hollow, according to Dumbledore), Voldemort thought that he would be able to make more Horcruxes. Isn't it interesting that Dumbledore seems to think that Voldemort no longer can do that? That might set a gleam to Dumbledore's eye!
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() Last edited by Wimsey; April 27th, 2007 at 2:11 pm. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
I have not read HBP in a while so my time lines are a little off. If someone could, please remind whether or not Voldemort met with Dippet before, after or during the time he worked at B&B. If he did have access, I think he would have hidden something at Hogwarts. It was a place that was extremely important to him. Just as Hogwarts is a symbol of a home to Harry, Hogwarts was a sign of Voldemort's greatness and power to him. Any chance that he could have to get something in there, he would.
The theory of the ROR is not that farfetched to me. Though others have stated that it would diminish either Voldemort or Dumbledore to have him hide it in the room, I'm not sure I agree. Even though Voldemort had a specific plan in mind for the diary, it was unlike the intelligent paranoid that many have been talking about to leave an unprotected horocrux with Malfoy. That is not in character for him. We could assume that the hiding places for his earlier horocrux were chosen when he was younger and less thoughtful of their protection but he would not have given this to Malfoy until he was much older. |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
This response may not apply to getting back in the ROR, but is more to the speculation on what might be in the locket.
Lockets quite often hold pictures. We've already seen the picture of Mrs. Black permanently stuck on the wall. Perhaps there is a picture permantly attached inside of the locket (if opened) that will help point the Trio in the right direction. The picture might have been placed there before Voldermort acquired it and cannot be removed by him. |
|
#56
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
There is no indication that Voldemort returned to Hogwarts in the interim. Dumbledore should have commented on that, and collected memories from people who met with him when he visited. Surely some of the staff would have had recollections of this. Quote:
Also, remember that Voldemort needs more than just to visit, unless he was using the Chamber. That seems implausible because Voldemort would not have sent the Diary to the Chamber if he already had a Horcrux in there. If it was somewhere else, then Voldemort would need to create defenses, traps, etc. This could not be done in a single visit. We have seen how much care Voldemort puts into guarding his Horcruxes with the Cave: why would we expect him to go for a quick and dirty solution at that same time? Quote:
Quote:
(Again, remember that Voldemort did NOT leave the Diary with Malfoy for Malfoy to protect: Malfoy was supposed to sneak the Diary into Hogwarts. Dumbledore is absolutely clear about this: Malfoy went ahead with the original plan when he planted the Diary on a student. So, we can look at this in a couple of different ways. One, Dumbledore was wrong about Voldemort's character. Two, Hogwarts was so inaccessible to Voldemort that he had to resort to using the Diary to get a Horcrux into Hogwarts. Rowling says assume that Dumbledore is right, and #2 necessarily follows from what Dumbledore teaches Harry. So, I'm going with #2! Quote:
Quote:
Keep in mind that people have hypothesized (with good reason) more places outside of Hogwarts that should be important to Voldemort than he has Horcruxes to hide. Moreover, we have not learned all that we will about Voldemort. So, given that Voldemort has multiple choices, why take one that has some clue pointing to it?
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
The thing about Malfoy and the diary is the question of when Voldemort gave him the diary and why did Malfoy decide to use it after he thought that Voldemort was gone for good? When did Malfoy get the instructions to smuggle the diary into Hogwarts? Did Draco tell his father that Voldemort was hiding in Quirrell's head or what? Why hadn't Riddle hidden the diary in ROR before he left Hogwarts as he doesn't seem to have used it as an adult and if he'd hidden it before he left school he might have been able to manipulate the finding of it as Tom Riddle.
Sorry for the rambling - I've had the flu for over a week now and stll am muzzy-headed so if that didn't make sense ignore it. |
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
However, Dumbledore notes that this was shortly before Voldemort disappeared. As Malfoy assumed Voldemort to be dead, Malfoy obvoiusly Quote:
If we look at the timeline, Voldemort likely did not turn the Diary into a Horcrux until fairly late. When Voldemort kills Hepzibah, he has only a trace of Horcrux damage (flashing red eyes) and the Ring is gone. When he visits Dumbledore 10 years later, he now has the Locket and the Cup, and his physical tranformation is about halfway towards "Voldemort classic." This suggests that he has another 2-3 to go. Also, this is the time where Voldemort now realizes that he is not getting back into Hogwarts quickly: he had honestly hoped to be allowed back in as a teacher. So, it would have been at this time that he realized that he needed careful planning to insert himself back into Hogwarts. It might simply have taken time to devise the Diary scheme, as well as additional experience with Horcruxes to fully grasp the theory behind what to expect when you put a piece of soul in with a bunch of memories.
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
We have these facts as defined by Dumbledore: 1. Voldemort didn't trust anybody 2. Voldemort would have chosen objects which meant something to him 3. Voldemort would have been foolish to put more than one horcrux in the same location 4. Voldemort had no way of getting into Hogwarts once he had established himself as a threat, meaning forming Death Eaters, etc. Voldemort took a chance of losing the horcrux by giving it to Malfoy. Voldemort also knew that Parseltongue was a rare ability and getting into the Chamber required parseltongue. He probably felt pretty confident that his diary could do exactly what he wanted it to do. He just didn't know that a kid named Harry Potter would foil his evil plot. So, to bring this back around to the topic, Voldemort already planned to have a diary horcrux in Hogwarts. He would not have put a second one in the Room of Requirement. Last edited by SusanBones; April 28th, 2007 at 2:13 pm. |
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Room of Requirement One Last Time
Quote:
And SusanBones111 brings us back promptly to the point of the "digression." The idea that there is a Horcrux in the Room of Requirement works only if Voldemort had ample access to the room while he had the Horcrux in question. However, the only two items that Voldemort had prior to leaving school were not hidden there. Afterwards, Voldemort had such restricted access to Hogwarts that he was forced to resort to the Diary Plot to get something into Hogwarts. This leaves the Room of Requirement a very unlikely place for Voldemort to have put a Horcrux. Even if it did fit his style, then he simply did not have access to it after he acquire the Cup or the Ravenclaw/Gryffindor item. We should also remember that the Room of Requirement has been important to two consecutive plots. It might be better to retire that particular plot element at this point. Rowling has a healthy imagination: let's see something new!
__________________
My 5 cents on cinematic presentation of the Deathly Hallows story..... (It doubles for The Hobbit, too!) “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don't put it there.” - A. P. Chekhov, Gurlyand's Reminiscences, and who knew why the Dog was long before the Shack! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Original content is Copyright © MMII - MMVIII, CoSForums.com. All Rights Reserved. Other content (posts, images, etc) is Copyright © its respective owners. |
|