Snape and Voldemort, the same person?

*rhhgrt* · #**101** October 13th, 2005, 11:50 pm

So is this thread now dead?

GinnyRules · #**102** October 14th, 2005, 12:27 am

Yeah I guess so. Oh well.

*junika3* · #**103** April 27th, 2006, 1:42 pm

Well, let me try to bring it back to life, shall I?

No, I do not think that they're the same person. Why? Because Dumbledore has seen Voldemort in his youth and at at time, Snape probably wasn't even born.

marauder1031 · #**104** July 17th, 2006, 2:30 am

Um, his scar hurt because Voldemort was head-sharing with Quirrell, who was sitting right there. Harry seeing Snape when it happened only helped Harry to think that Snape is no good. Revealing the plot point at that time... well, that wouldn't have been any fun, so Harry had to believe it was because of Snape... but it wasn't.

Cless · #**105** July 17th, 2006, 2:39 am

Very well said Marauder. His scar hurt because of Quirrell and Voldemort sharing a body

*Shewoman* · #**106** July 17th, 2006, 8:11 pm

It's not possible. And I don't see how it adds anything to the plot; most of the non-DE characters in the book haven't been seen with Voldemort, largely because we don't see him that much.

*rainie_hp* · #**107** July 17th, 2006, 8:13 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shewoman

It's not possible. And I don't see how it adds anything to the plot; most of the non-DE characters in the book haven't been seen with Voldemort, largely because we don't see him that much.

I am with you on that one!

Hermione762 · #**108** July 17th, 2006, 9:44 pm

I don't think they are the same person because in the first book and movie when he looked at snape his scar did hurt but I think it was because professor Quille i can't spell his name but the guy with the purple hat was sitting next to snape when harry looked at him and voldermort was on the back of the proffesors head and the proffesors head was facing harry when he look ed thats what i think...... anybody else with another reason???????¿¿¿¿¿¿¿

genius24 · #**109** July 17th, 2006, 10:16 pm

They're not the same person.It hurt because he was looking at Voldemort through the turban.

*unconvinced* · #**110** July 17th, 2006, 10:37 pm

I supose this is possible but it is unlikely firstly if Snape was bad then Voldemort wouldn't need to change into him as Snape could do it all by himself. However this theory presents some interesting posibilities and could answer some questions, for example why Snape didn't go to the Department of Mysteries or didn't apparate to Voldemorts side in GoF (as this theory would cancel out the not wanting to blow his cover excuse). It would also explaine Voldemorts absence in book 6.

Muahahaha · #**111** July 17th, 2006, 10:49 pm

Interesting theory but I don't believe it's true. There would have been countless times that Harry would have been vulnerable to Snape and nothing was done.

*rainie_hp* · #**112** July 17th, 2006, 11:10 pm

Besides if Snape was Volemort how come he was in human form for 11 years?

Lady_Morgan · #**113** July 18th, 2006, 5:07 pm

well how could they be? it doesn't make sense

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord_Godric

I doubt it because why wouldn't Voldemort/Snape just kill harry...i mean what would stop him...my understanding from the movie (seeing how i haven't read book 1 in years) is that is was Quirrel's head/V that made harry's scar hurt...

exactly

deBergerac · #**114** July 31st, 2006, 4:05 pm

Maybe the scar hurt because Snape was Legilimencing at Harry, whereby Horcrux-Voldemort was dimly sensing Snape (a DE who's left forever, that's a headache).

*RWeasleysgirl* · #**115** July 31st, 2006, 6:12 pm

I thought his scar hurt that time because Quirrel was facing away from him, therefore Voldemort would be facing him. And I like the theory, it’s good, but doesn’t it seem a little… Psycho? Not to call you Psycho but, you know what I mean, like… Norman Bates/Mother Psycho?

deBergerac · #**116** August 1st, 2006, 12:25 am

I don't believe my own theory on this! Just playing devil's advocate. I don't like the "x person is really y" sort of theory. Someone more mathematically inclined could do a minimum-number-of-characters calculation and write a Reduced Harry Potter Series to be played by a cast of max. 7 persons perhaps!

*RWeasleysgirl* · #**117** August 1st, 2006, 3:39 am

Lol, as long as Ron has a part in your seven character Harry Potter, I’m all for it! lol

*lupislune* · #**118** September 17th, 2006, 4:47 am

I have to admit that the idea of Snape being Voldemort is quite interesting, but I find myself struggling to find evidence to support it. I mean, there could be indirect evidence in the fact that we never see Voldemort and Snape in the same scene, or have yet to anyway. I am sure that from a Bellatrix's standpoint that if she did not see Snape and Voldemort together at least once that she herself would raise questions. This idea, although interesting, doesn't really support the idea either way, for me anyway.

HJP navy seal · #**119** September 17th, 2006, 5:38 am

Okay, I like your theory and all, but you havve to think of the ending "battle" in book 6...

"No!" roared Snape's voice, and the pain stopped as suddenly as it had started; Harry lay curled on the dark grass, clutching his wand and panting; somewhere overhead Snape was shouting, "Have you forgotten our orders? Potter belongs to the Dark Lord-we are to leave him! Go! Go!"

huckleberry · #**120** September 17th, 2006, 10:40 am

Maybe not. its way different. Snape has his own perceptions and i think Voldemort would have chosen a better plan that that.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

	Contact Us - MuggleNet.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Original content is Copyright © MMII - MMVIII, CoSForums.com. All Rights Reserved. Other content (posts, images, etc) is Copyright © its respective owners.